The Frequency and Intensity of Representative and Nonrepresentative Late Adolescent Team-Sport Athletes' Training Schedules
- PMID: 32084108
- DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003449
The Frequency and Intensity of Representative and Nonrepresentative Late Adolescent Team-Sport Athletes' Training Schedules
Abstract
Scantlebury, S, Till, K, Sawczuk, T, Dalton-Barron, N, Phibbs, P, and Jones, B. The frequency and intensity of representative and nonrepresentative late adolescent team-sport athletes' training schedules. J Strength Cond Res 35(12): 3400-3406, 2021-This study aimed to identify and compare the training frequency and intensity (via session rating of perceived exertion load [sRPE load]) of representative and nonrepresentative late adolescent athletes. Thirty-six team sport athletes completed a web-based questionnaire daily over an 8-month period, reporting their training/match activities from the previous day. Athletes were categorized as representative (academy/county/international) or nonrepresentative (club/school) depending on the highest level of their sport they participated. Mean weekly frequencies and sRPE load of different training/match activities were quantified for each athlete across 5 school terms. Mann-Whitney U tests established the significance of differences and effect sizes between playing standards for mean weekly frequencies and mean sRPE load. Within-athlete weekly sRPE loads were highly variable for both playing standards; however, representative level athletes participated in significantly more activity outside of school compared with nonrepresentative athletes during November-December (effect size; 0.43-club technical training; 0.36-club matches), January-February (effect size; 0.78-club technical training; 0.75-club matches), and February-March (effect size; 0.63-club technical training; 0.44-club matches). Therefore, club and school coaches must ensure that all elements of representative athletes training schedules are coordinated and flexible to promote positive adaptions to training such as skill and physical development and prevent maladaptive responses such as overuse injury and nonfunctional overreaching. A cooperative and malleable training schedule between club/school coaches and the athlete will allow the athlete to perform on multiple fronts while also being able to meet the demands of additional stressors such as schoolwork.
Copyright © 2020 National Strength and Conditioning Association.
References
-
- Arruda AFS, Aoki MS, Paludo AC, Moreira A. Salivary steroid response and competitive anxiety in elite basketball players: Effect of opponent level. Physiol Behav 177: 291–296, 2017.
-
- Brink MS, Kersten AW, Frencken WGP. Understanding the mismatch between coaches' and players' perceptions of exertion. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 12: 1–25, 2016.
-
- Cosh S, Tully PJ. “All I have to do is pass” : A discursive analysis of student athletes' talk about prioritising sport to the detriment of education to overcome stressors encountered in combining elite sport and tertiary education. Psychol Sport Exerc 15: 180–189, 2014.
-
- Cosh S, Tully PJ. Stressors, coping, and support mechanisms for student athletes combining elite sport and tertiary Education : Implications for practice. Sport Psychol 19: 120–133, 2015.
-
- Difiori JP, Benjamin HJ, Brenner J, et al. Overuse injuries and burnout in youth sports: A position statement from the American medical society for sports medicine. Clin J Sport Med 24: 3–20, 2014.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
