Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2020 Feb 18;12(2):127.
doi: 10.3390/toxins12020127.

Efficacy and Safety of OnabotulinumtoxinA 400 Units in Patients with Post-Stroke Upper Limb Spasticity: Final Report of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial with an Open-Label Extension Phase

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Efficacy and Safety of OnabotulinumtoxinA 400 Units in Patients with Post-Stroke Upper Limb Spasticity: Final Report of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial with an Open-Label Extension Phase

Masahiro Abo et al. Toxins (Basel). .

Abstract

In many countries, 400 units (U) is the maximum dose of onabotulinumtoxinA available to treat upper limb spasticity, but few studies have demonstrated the optimal use of this dose. In the double-blind phase of this randomized, controlled trial, we compared the efficacy and safety of 400 vs. 240 U onabotulinumtoxinA in patients with post-stroke upper limb spasticity. Both groups received 240 U onabotulinumtoxinA injected in the forearm. An additional 160 U onabotulinumtoxinA (400 U group) or placebo (240 U group) was injected in the elbow flexors. Both groups showed similar muscle tone reduction in the wrist, fingers, and thumb; muscle tone reduction in the elbow flexors was greater in the group treated with onabotulinumtoxinA (400 U group) compared to placebo (240 U group). Functional disabilities improved in both groups. No substantial difference was found in safety profiles. In the subsequent open-label phase, all participants received repeat injections of 400 U onabotulinumtoxinA (target muscles and doses per muscle determined by the physician). Similar efficacy and safety outcomes, as with the 400 U group in the double-blind phase, were confirmed. This final report demonstrates that injection of onabotulinumtoxinA 400 U relieves muscle tone in a wide range of areas and improves functional disabilities; generally, it was well-tolerated, and no new safety concerns were identified. The dosing data in the open-label phase will inform optimal use of onabotulinumtoxinA in clinical practice (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03261167).

Keywords: botulinum toxin; randomized controlled trial; stroke; upper limb spasticity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

This study (NCT03261167) was conducted with a research fund from GlaxoSmithKline K.K., in which Masahiro Abo, Takashi Shigematsu and Hiroyoshi Hara participated as principal investigator and their institutions received funding in relation to this work. Yasuko Matsuda, Akinori Nimura, Yoshiyuki Yamashita and Kaoru Takahashi are employees of GlaxoSmithKline K.K. OnabotulinumtoxinA was provided by Allergan plc.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study design. BoNT/A, botulinum toxin type A (onabotulinumtoxinA). Reproduced with permission from Abo, M., et al., Progress in Medicine, published by Life Science Co., Ltd., 2019 [in Japanese].
Figure 2
Figure 2
Change from baseline in the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) scores across all treatment cycles for the 400 U group at (a) elbow, (b) wrist, (c) fingers, and (d) thumb. Treatment cycles are represented as: treatment cycle 1 (double-blind phase, purple), treatment cycle 2 (open-label phase, green), treatment cycle 3 (open-label phase, yellow), and treatment cycle 4 (open-label phase, red). CI, confidence interval.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lance J.W. Symposium synopsis. In: Feldman R.G., Young R.R., Koella W.P., editors. Spasticity: Disordered Motor Control. Year Book Medical Publishers; Chicago, IL, USA: 1980. pp. 485–494.
    1. Doan Q.V., Brashear A., Gillard P.J., Varon S.F., Vandenburgh A.M., Turkel C.C., Elovic E.P. Relationship between disability and health-related quality of life and caregiver burden in patients with upper limb poststroke spasticity. PM R. 2012;4:4–10. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2011.10.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Esquenazi A., Novak I., Sheean G., Singer B.J., Ward A.B. International consensus statement for the use of botulinum toxin treatment in adults and children with neurological impairments: Introduction. Eur. J. Neurol. 2010;17(Suppl. 2):1–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2010.03125.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sheean G., Lannin N.A., Turner-Stokes L., Rawicki B., Snow B.J. Botulinum toxin assessment, intervention and after-care for upper limb hypertonicity in adults: International consensus statement. Eur. J. Neurol. 2010;17(Suppl. 2):74–93. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2010.03129.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brin M.F., James C., Maltman J. Botulinum toxin type A products are not interchangeable: A review of the evidence. Biologics. 2014;8:227–241. doi: 10.2147/BTT.S65603. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data