Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb 21;15(1):64.
doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01584-y.

Syndesmotic malreduction may decrease fixation stability: a biomechanical study

Lu Bai  1   2 , Wentao Zhang  3 , Siyao Guan  1 , Jianxin Liu  4 , Peng Chen  1
Affiliations

Syndesmotic malreduction may decrease fixation stability: a biomechanical study

Lu Bai et al. J Orthop Surg Res. .

Abstract

Background: This study aims to investigate the malreduction of syndesmosis and its effects on stability.

Methods: The biomechanical tests, including the three-dimensional (3D) displacement of the syndesmotic incisura, fibular rotation angle, and torque resistance, were performed on six cadaver legs. These specimens were first tested intact (intact group), then cut all the syndesmotic ligaments and fixed in anatomical position (anatomical model group) and test again. After that, syndesmosis was fixed in 1 cm malreduction (anterior and posterior displacement group) to do the same test.

Results: In internal or external load, there were significant differences in torque resistance and fibular rotation angle (internal t = 2.412, P = 0.036; external t = 2.412, P = 0.039) between the intact and post-malreduction groups. In internal rotation load, there were significant differences in sagittal displacement between the intact and post-malreduction groups (P = 0.011), and between the anatomical and post-malreduction groups (P = 0.020). In external rotation load, significant differences existed between the intact and ant-malreduction group (P = 0.034) in sagittal (anterior-posterior) displacement. Significant differences also existed between the intact and post-malreduction groups (P = 0.013), and between the anatomical and post-malreduction groups (P = 0.038) in coronal (medial-lateral) displacement.

Conclusions: Malreduction in different conditions does affect the stability of the syndesmotic fixation. The result of the study may reveal the biomechanical mechanism of poor clinical outcome in syndesmosis malreduction patients and pathological displacement patterns of the ankle under syndesmotic malreduction conditions.

Level of evidence: III.

Keywords: Biomechanical stability; Malreduction; Syndesmotic separation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Experimental protocol
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Experimental setup. The specimen was fixed on MTS machine. Blue arrow pointed optical marker of tibia and fibular. Red arrow pointed marker of syndesmosis incisura. White arrow pointed to the marker fixed on the base of the system
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The CT scan of different bony tunnels created by 3D template. AT, anterior malreduction group; AN, anatomical group; PT, posterior malreduction group
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Summary of the sagittal, axial, and coronal displacements in the external and internal rotation models. Asterisk denotes the significant difference when compared with the intact group. Triangle denotes significant difference when compared with the anatomical group
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Hunt KJ, et al. Epidemiology of syndesmosis injuries in intercollegiate football: incidence and risk factors from National Collegiate Athletic Association injury surveillance system data from 2004-2005 to 2008-2009. Clin J Sport Med. 2013;23(4):278–282. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0b013e31827ee829. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Carr JC, 2nd, Werner BC, Yarboro SR. An update on management of syndesmosis injury: a national US database study. Am J Orthop. 2016;45(7):E472. - PubMed
    1. Gardner MJ, et al. Malreduction of the tibiofibular syndesmosis in ankle fractures. Foot Ankle Int. 2006;27(10):788–792. doi: 10.1177/107110070602701005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sagi HC, Shah AR, Sanders RW. The functional consequence of syndesmotic joint malreduction at a minimum 2-year follow-up. J Orthop Trauma. 2012;26(7):439–443. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31822a526a. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tsai J, et al. Strength of syndesmosis fixation: 2 TightRope versus 1 TightRope with plate-and-screw construction. Foot Ankle Surg. 2017;23(2):143. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2017.07.524. - DOI