Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb 22;21(1):216.
doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-4140-7.

Randomized trial comparing low-pressure versus standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic colectomy: PAROS trial

Affiliations

Randomized trial comparing low-pressure versus standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic colectomy: PAROS trial

S Celarier et al. Trials. .

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopy, by its minimally invasive nature, has revolutionized digestive and particularly colorectal surgery by decreasing post-operative pain, morbidity, and length of hospital stay. In this trial, we aim to assess whether low pressure in laparoscopic colonic surgery (7 mm Hg instead of 12 mm Hg) could further reduce pain, analgesic consumption, and morbidity, resulting in a shorter hospital stay.

Methods and analysis: The PAROS trial is a phase III, double-blind, randomized controlled trial. We aim to recruit 138 patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy. Participants will be randomly assigned to either a low-pressure group (7 mm Hg) or a standard-pressure group (12 mm Hg). The primary outcome will be a comparison of length of hospital stay between the two groups. Secondary outcomes will compare post-operative pain, consumption of analgesics, morbidity within 30 days, technical and oncological quality of the surgical procedure, time to passage of flatus and stool, and ambulation. All adverse events will be recorded. Analysis will be performed on an intention-to-treat basis.

Trial registration: This research received the approval from the Committee for the Protection of Persons and was the subject of information to the ANSM. This search is saved in the ID-RCB database under registration number 2018-A03028-47. This research is retrospectively registered January 23, 2019, at http://clinicaltrials.gov/ed under the name "LaPAroscopic Low pRessure cOlorectal Surgery (PAROS)". This trial is ongoing.

Keywords: Colectomy; Laparoscopy; Low-pressure pneumoperitoneum.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Timeline of PAROS Study
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
PAROS Study analgesic protocol

References

    1. Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, Castells A, Taurá P, Piqué JM. Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2002;359(9325):2224–2229. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09290-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Braga M, Frasson M, Zuliani W, Vignali A. Pecorelli. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open left colonic resection. Br J Surg. 2010;97(8):1180–1186. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7094. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Leung KL, Kwok SP, Lam SC, Lee JF, Yiu RY, Ng SS. Laparoscopic resectionof rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomised trial. Lancet. 2004;363(9416):1187–1192. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15947-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hasegawa H, Kabeshima Y, Watanabe M, Yamamoto S, Kitajima M. Controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open colectomy for advanced colorectal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2003;17(4):636–640. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-8516-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bonjer HJ, Hop WC, Nelson H, Sargent DJ, Lacy AM, Castells A, et al. Transatlantic Laparoscopically Assisted vs Open Colectomy Trials Study Group. Laparoscopically assisted vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a meta-analysis. Arch Surg. 2007;142(3):298–303. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.142.3.298. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms