The effects of latency period in PPROM cases managed expectantly
- PMID: 32089027
- DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2020.1731465
The effects of latency period in PPROM cases managed expectantly
Abstract
Objective: Preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM), associated with prematurity, is an important obstetric complication that may cause neonatal mortality and morbidity. The optimal delivery time is controversial in cases with the expectant approach. The fetal effects of long-term exposure to PPROM are unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the maternal and fetal outcomes of expectantly-managed PPROM cases with different latency periods at 240/7-346/7 weeks of gestation.Material and method: The study group consisted of 206 patients at 240/7-346/7 weeks of gestation who met the inclusion criteria. Patients were divided into three groups according to their weeks of PPROM diagnosis as 240/7-286/7, 290/7-316/7, and 320/7-346/7. The period from membrane rupture to delivery was defined as the latency period and divided into three subgroups as 3-7 days, 8-13 days and ≥14 days. In addition to the demographic characteristics of the patients, maternal and obstetric complications, primary and secondary neonatal outcomes were compared between the groups. Primary neonatal outcomes were determined in terms of pathological Apgar scores (<5 at minute 1, <7 at minute 5), requiring resuscitation, admission to Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) and NICU length of stay. Secondary neonatal outcomes were determined in terms of respiratory distress syndrome, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, intraventricular hemorrhage, retinopathy of prematurity, necrotizing enterocolitis, patent ductus arteriosus, periventricular leukomalacia, and neonatal sepsis. In addition, for the prediction of morbidity and mortality, newborns were evaluated by SNAPPE II (Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology with Perinatal extension-II) consisting of the combination of biochemical and physiological parameters, using the parameters including mean blood pressure (mm/Hg), corporal temperature (°C), PO2/FiO2 ratio, lowest serum pH, multiple seizures, urine output (ml/kg/hr), Apgar score, birth weight, and small for gestational age. The higher the score of SNAPPE II, the higher the morbidity and mortality risk of neonates. For the statistical analysis, the Kruskal Wallis and one-way ANOVA tests were utilized for the numerical data. Categorical data were compared using the chi-square test. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) test was used to determine the threshold value of the data affecting neonatal morbidity.Results: The mean PPROM week was found to be 29.7 ± 3.0 weeks and the mean delivery week was 31.8 ± 2.5 weeks. The mean latency period for all the patients was 15.1 ± 13.8 days. Clinic chorioamnionitis was observed in 17% of the cases. The lowest chorioamnionitis rate (8.6%) was in the 3-7-day latency period group. Total complications were significantly lower in the 290/7-316/7 week PPROM group in which the latency period was ≥14 days, compared to those in 3-7 days and 8-13 days (p = .001). Total complications were lower in the < 32 weeks PPROM groups in which the latency period was ≥14 days compared to those obtained in 3-7 days and 8-13 days. There was no significant difference between the latency period and total complications after 32 weeks (p = .422). The best discriminative cutoff value of SNAPPE-II for neonatal morbidity was 11.0 (sensitivity 82%, specificity 80%). In the present study, the optimal latency period for the best neonatal outcomes was found to be 34.5 days (sensitivity 70% and specificity 84%) between weeks 240/7-286/7, and 11.0 days between weeks 290/7-316/7 (sensitivity 68% and specificity 85%).Conclusions: Our findings indicated that a long latency period did not increase neonatal morbidity and there was no increase in neonatal complications after 32 weeks of the gestational period compared to those obtained before 32 weeks.
Keywords: Expectant management; latency; neonatal outcome; pregnancy; preterm birth; preterm premature rupture of membranes.
Similar articles
-
Outcomes of expectantly managed pregnancies with multiple gestations and preterm premature rupture of membranes prior to 26 weeks.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Feb;212(2):215.e1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.09.005. Epub 2014 Sep 16. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015. PMID: 25218125 Free PMC article.
-
Intentional early delivery versus expectant management for preterm premature rupture of membranes at 28-32 weeks' gestation: A multicentre randomized controlled trial (MICADO STUDY).Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019 Feb;233:30-37. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.11.024. Epub 2018 Dec 5. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019. PMID: 30553135 Clinical Trial.
-
Latency duration of preterm premature rupture of membranes and neonatal outcome: a retrospective single-center experience.Eur J Pediatr. 2022 Feb;181(2):801-811. doi: 10.1007/s00431-021-04245-2. Epub 2021 Oct 4. Eur J Pediatr. 2022. PMID: 34605998 Free PMC article.
-
Perinatal outcomes of pregnancies complicated by preterm premature rupture of the membranes before 34 weeks of gestation in a tertiary center in China: A retrospective review.Biosci Trends. 2015 Feb;9(1):35-41. doi: 10.5582/bst.2014.01058. Biosci Trends. 2015. PMID: 25787907 Review.
-
PPROM in the late preterm period: an argument for expectant management.Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2025 Mar;7(1S):101563. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101563. Epub 2024 Nov 26. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2025. PMID: 39603529 Review.
Cited by
-
Latency to delivery and incidence of adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomes in preterm premature rupture of membranes before 32 weeks.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025 Jun;311(6):1569-1577. doi: 10.1007/s00404-025-07970-3. Epub 2025 Feb 10. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025. PMID: 39928128 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of the Fetomaternal Outcome in Women With Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes on Expectant Management Versus Delivery at 34 Weeks.Cureus. 2024 Sep 8;16(9):e68917. doi: 10.7759/cureus.68917. eCollection 2024 Sep. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39381452 Free PMC article.
-
Conservative management of preterm premature rupture of membranes < 30 weeks of gestational age: Effectiveness of clinical guidelines implementation strategies.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2023 Jun 16;19:100209. doi: 10.1016/j.eurox.2023.100209. eCollection 2023 Sep. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2023. PMID: 37426941 Free PMC article.
-
The role of D-dimer changes in predicting delivery time in preterm premature rupture of membranes: a retrospective analysis.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025 Feb;311(2):323-331. doi: 10.1007/s00404-025-07940-9. Epub 2025 Jan 28. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025. PMID: 39873767 Free PMC article.
-
Risk factors associated with shortened latency before delivery in outpatients managed for preterm prelabor rupture of membranes.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022 Jan;101(1):119-126. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14287. Epub 2021 Nov 7. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022. PMID: 34747005 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Supplementary concepts
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous