Building a therapeutic relationship between probation officers and probationers with serious mental illnesses
- PMID: 32089148
- PMCID: PMC7483174
- DOI: 10.1017/S1092852919001871
Building a therapeutic relationship between probation officers and probationers with serious mental illnesses
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to engage in a collaborative process with a variety of stakeholders to develop the Brief Intervention to Promote Service Engagement (BIPSE), which aims to enhance the therapeutic relationship between probation officers and probationers with serious mental illnesses (SMI).
Methods: The BIPSE intervention was developed through a multistage "design for implementation" process, including a series of stakeholder meetings, observations of probation supervision sessions, incorporating existing intervention approaches, and workshopping initial BIPSE components with three randomly selected officers from a specialized mental health probation unit. Acceptability and feasibility of BIPSE components were assessed through focus groups with probation officers, additional observations of probation sessions, and qualitative interviews with probationers with SMI.
Results: Two foundational components of the BIPSE intervention were identified during the stakeholder meetings and observations: (1) engagement and (2) shared decision-making. These two components inform and undergird the intervention's third component, strategic case management. During focus groups, probation officers expressed interest in using the modified tools they were given and also saw the benefit of structuring their sessions. Probationers expressed their appreciation for the caring and collaborative nature with which their probation officers approached their sessions.
Conclusion: Building a therapeutic relationship between probation officers and probationers with SMI is an essential task toward improving mental health and criminal justice outcomes. The BIPSE development and refinement process demonstrates that interventions targeting the therapeutic relationship are acceptable to officers and clients, and can be tailored and feasibly structured into standard probation practices.
Keywords: Engagement; intervention; probation; serious mental illness; shared decision-making; therapeutic relationship.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Walking the line: specialized and standard probation officer perspectives on supervising probationers with serious mental illnesses.Int J Law Psychiatry. 2014 Sep-Oct;37(5):473-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2014.02.020. Epub 2014 Mar 26. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2014. PMID: 24680641
-
Statewide mental health training for probation officers: improving knowledge and decreasing stigma.Health Justice. 2017 Nov 15;5(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s40352-017-0057-y. Health Justice. 2017. PMID: 29143153 Free PMC article.
-
How do probation officers assess and manage recidivism and violence risk for probationers with mental disorder? An experimental investigation.Law Hum Behav. 2013 Feb;37(1):22-34. doi: 10.1037/h0093991. Epub 2012 Apr 2. Law Hum Behav. 2013. PMID: 22468760
-
Toward evidence-based practice for probationers and parolees mandated to mental health treatment.Psychiatr Serv. 2006 Mar;57(3):333-42. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.57.3.333. Psychiatr Serv. 2006. PMID: 16524990 Review.
-
Jail diversion: the Miami model.CNS Spectr. 2020 Oct;25(5):659-666. doi: 10.1017/S1092852920000127. Epub 2020 Mar 20. CNS Spectr. 2020. PMID: 32195644 Review.
Cited by
-
The characteristics of high-quality health and social care for people on probation: Professional and lived experience perspectives.Probat J. 2024 Jan 23:10.1177/02645505231222961. doi: 10.1177/02645505231222961. Online ahead of print. Probat J. 2024. PMID: 39420947 Free PMC article.
-
Challenges to Employing Shared Decision Making With Adults Under Community Supervision Who Have a Mental Illness.Front Psychiatry. 2021 Nov 4;12:773411. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.773411. eCollection 2021. Front Psychiatry. 2021. PMID: 34803780 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Probation and COVID-19: Lessons learned to improve health-related practice.Probat J. 2022 Jun;69(2):216-234. doi: 10.1177/02645505221087980. Probat J. 2022. PMID: 38603142 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Smart decarceration: achieving criminal justice transformation in the 21st century. New York: Oxford University Press; 2017.
-
- Travis J, Western B, Redburn S. The Growth of Incarceration in the United States:: Exploring Causes and Consequences. National Academies Press; 2014.
-
- Mauer M Addressing racial disparities in incarceration. The Prison Journal. 2011;91(3 suppl):87S–101S.
-
- Steadman H, Osher F, Robbins P, Case B, Samuels S. Prevalence of serious mental illness among jail inmates. Psychiatric Services. 2009;60(6):761–765. - PubMed
-
- Fazel S, Danesh J. Serious mental disorder in 23,000 prisoners: A systematic review of 62 surveys The Lancet. 2002;359:545–550. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical