Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review

Data Donations as Exercises of Sovereignty

In: The Ethics of Medical Data Donation [Internet]. Cham (CH): Springer; 2019. Chapter 3.
.
Affiliations
Free Books & Documents
Review

Data Donations as Exercises of Sovereignty

Patrik Hummel et al.
Free Books & Documents

Excerpt

We propose that the notion of individual sovereignty encompasses more than having the power to exclude others from one’s personal space. Instead, sovereignty is realized at least in part along outward-reaching, interactive and participatory dimensions. On the basis of reflections from gift theory, we argue that donations can generate social bonds, convey recognition and open up new options in social space. By virtue of these features, donations offer the potential to advance individual sovereignty. We go on to highlight distinctive benefits of data donations, before articulating several difficulties and puzzles: data donors are bound to have a limited grip on future uses of their data and the people affected by their decision to share. Further characteristic traits of data donations come from the invasive and comprehensive character of state-of-the-art data gathering and processing tools, and the fact that the relevant sense of data ownership is far from straightforward. In order to minimize tensions with negative, protective aspects of sovereignty, we argue that thoughtful mechanisms at the level of consent procedures, the representation of data subjects in governance structures, and organizational-level constraints are necessary. Along the way, we will devote particular attention to challenges and opportunities within big data contexts.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. 23andMe. 2018. Becoming part of something bigger. https://www.23andme.com/en-int/research/. Accessed 31 Jan 2018.
    1. Ajana, B. 2018. Communal self-tracking: Data philanthropy, solidarity and privacy. In Self-tracking, ed. B. Ajana, 125–141. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65379-2_9. - DOI
    1. Baylis, F., N.P. Kenny, and S. Sherwin. 2008. A relational account of public health ethics. Public Health Ethics 1 (3): 196–209. https://doi.org/10.1093/phe/phn025. - DOI
    1. Berliner, L.S., and N.J. Kenworthy. 2017. Producing a worthy illness: Personal crowdfunding amidst financial crisis. Social Science & Medicine (1982) 187: 233–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.02.008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bialobrzeski, A., J. Ried, and P. Dabrock. 2012. Differentiating and evaluating common good and public good: Making implicit assumptions explicit in the contexts of consent and duty to participate. Public Health Genomics 15 (5): 285–292. https://doi.org/10.1159/000336861. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources