Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review

Ethical Medical Data Donation: A Pressing Issue

In: The Ethics of Medical Data Donation [Internet]. Cham (CH): Springer; 2019. Chapter 1.
.
Affiliations
Free Books & Documents
Review

Ethical Medical Data Donation: A Pressing Issue

Jenny Krutzinna et al.
Free Books & Documents

Excerpt

While donation schemes with dedicated regulatory frameworks have made it relatively easy to donate blood, organs or tissue, it is virtually impossible to donate one’s own medical data. The lack of appropriate framework to govern such data donation makes it practically difficult to give away one’s data, even when this would be within the current limits of the law. Arguments for facilitation of such a process have been advanced but so far have not been implemented. Discussions on the ethics of using medical data tend to take a system-centric perspective and focus on what researchers and the health service may or may not do with data that are placed within their trust. Rarely, if ever, is the question of the data subjects preferences addressed beyond practical matters of obtaining valid consent. This constitutes an important omission in the ethical debate, which this volume seeks to address.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Mann, Sebastian Porsdam, Julian Savulescu, and Barbara J. Sahakian. 2016. Facilitating the ethical use of health data for the benefit of society: Electronic health records, consent and the duty of easy rescue. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 374 (2083): 20160130. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Öhman, Carl, and Luciano Floridi. 2018. An ethical framework for the digital afterlife industry. Nature Human Behaviour 2 (5): 318. - PubMed
    1. “Personal Genome Project: United Kingdom”. 2018. https://www.personalgenomes.org.uk/.
    1. Richardson, R., and B. Hurwitz. 1995. Donors’ attitudes towards body donation for dissection. The Lancet 346 (8970): 277–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(95)92166-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shaw, David M., Juliane V. Gross, and Thomas C. Erren. 2016. Data donation after death. EMBO Reports 17 (1): 14–17. https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.201541802. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources