Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb 24;18(1):20.
doi: 10.1186/s12969-020-0411-9.

Expert panel consensus recommendations for diagnosis and treatment of secondary osteoporosis in children

Affiliations

Expert panel consensus recommendations for diagnosis and treatment of secondary osteoporosis in children

Rocío Galindo-Zavala et al. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. .

Abstract

Background: Osteoporosis incidence in children is increasing due to the increased survival rate of patients suffering from chronic diseases and the increased use of drugs that can damage bones. Recent changes made to the definition of childhood osteoporosis, along with the lack of guidelines or national consensuses regarding its diagnosis and treatment, have resulted in a wide variability in the approaches used to treat this disease. For these reasons, the Osteogenesis Imperfecta and Childhood Osteoporosis Working Group of the Spanish Society of Pediatric Rheumatology has sounded the need for developing guidelines to standardize clinical practice with regard to this pathology.

Methods: An expert panel comprised of 6 pediatricians and 5 rheumatologists carried out a qualitative literature review and provided recommendations based on evidence, when that was available, or on their own experience. The level of evidence was determined for each section using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine (CEBM) system. A Delphi survey was conducted for those recommendations with an evidence level of IV or V. This survey was sent to all members of the SERPE. All recommendations that had a level of agreement higher or equal to 70% were included.

Results: Fifty-one recommendations, categorized into eight sections, were obtained. Twenty-four of them presented an evidence level 4 or 5, and therefore a Delphi survey was conducted. This was submitted electronically and received a response rate of 40%. All recommendations submitted to the Delphi round obtained a level of agreement of 70% or higher and were therefore accepted.

Conclusion: In summary, we present herein guidelines for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of secondary childhood osteoporosis based on the available evidence and expert clinical experience. We believe it can serve as a useful tool that will contribute to the standardization of clinical practice for this pathology. Prophylactic measures, early diagnosis and a proper therapeutic approach are essential to improving bone health, not only in children and adolescents, but also in the adults they will become in the future.

Keywords: Children; Low bone mineral density; Secondary osteoporosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

    1. Peck WA et al.Consensus development conference: diagnosis, prophylaxis, and treatment of osteoporosis. Am J Med. 1993;94(6):646-50. - PubMed
    1. Wade SW, Strader C, Fitzpatrick LA, Anthony MS, O’Malley CD. Estimating prevalence of osteoporosis: examples from industrialized countries. Arch Osteoporos. 2014;9:182. doi: 10.1007/s11657-014-0182-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yeste D, Carrascosa A. Valoración e interpretación de la masa ósea en la infancia y la adolescencia. Pediatr Integr. 2015;XIX(6):436.e1–436.e9.
    1. Galindo Zavala R, Núñez Cuadros E, Díaz Cordovés-Rego G, Urda Cardona AL. Advances in the treatment of secondary osteoporosis. An Pediatr. 2014;81(6):399.e1–399.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.anpedi.2014.05.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gordon CM, Leonard MB, Zemel BS. 2013 pediatric position development conference: executive summary and reflections. J Clin Densitom. 2014;17(2):219–224. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2014.01.007. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms