Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Dec;25(6):199-205.
doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2019-111295. Epub 2020 Feb 24.

Systematic benefit-risk assessment for buprenorphine implant: a semiquantitative method to support risk management

Affiliations
Review

Systematic benefit-risk assessment for buprenorphine implant: a semiquantitative method to support risk management

Vicki Osborne et al. BMJ Evid Based Med. 2020 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Prior to approval in the European Union, a systematic benefit-risk assessment was required to compare buprenorphine implant to sublingual buprenorphine as part of the license application to the European Medicines Agency.

Objective: The Benefit-Risk Action Team framework was used to describe the overall benefit-risk of buprenorphine implant in comparison to sublingual buprenorphine.

Study selection/methods: A value tree of key benefits and risks related to the implant formulation of buprenorphine was constructed. Risk differences (RD) or reporting ORs (ROR) and corresponding 95% CIs were calculated for each outcome, along with the number needed to treat and number needed to harm. Swing weighting was assigned to outcomes and the weighted net clinical benefit (wNCB) was calculated.

Findings: Key benefits assessed: reduced risk of illicit opioid use (RD=0.09, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.17), reduced risk of misuse and diversion (ROR=0.13, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.94), improved compliance and convenience (RD=0.20) and quality of life measures (RD=0.03). Key risks assessed: clinically significant implant breakage (RD=0.01, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.01), migration/missing implant (RD=0.01, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.02), infection at insertion/removal site (RD=0.08, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.12) and implant-related allergic reaction (RD=0.07, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.11). The wNCB for buprenorphine implant was 4.96, which suggests a favourable benefit-risk profile.

Conclusions: The benefit-risk profile of buprenorphine implant is considered favourable in comparison to sublingual buprenorphine, based on this semiquantitative analysis using available data. Further data from real-world use on benefits and risks should be used for ongoing monitoring of the benefit-risk profile of buprenorphine implants in the postmarketing setting.

Keywords: public health; substance misuse.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: FT is an employee of L Molteni & C dei F.lli Alitti, the marketing authorisation holder for Sixmo. VO, MD, DR and SAWS have no competing interests to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Value tree of key benefits and risks identified for buprenorphine implant.

References

    1. Degenhardt L, Charlson F, Mathers B, et al. . The global epidemiology and burden of opioid dependence: results from the global burden of disease 2010 study. Addiction 2014;109:1320–33. 10.1111/add.12551 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hser Y-I, Evans E, Grella C, et al. . Long-Term course of opioid addiction. Harv Rev Psychiatry 2015;23:76–89. 10.1097/HRP.0000000000000052 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Drug overdose deaths, 2018. Available: https://www.cdc.gov/drugoverdose/data/statedeaths.html [Accessed 16 Aug 2019].
    1. Scholl L. Drug and Opioid-Involved overdose deaths — United States, 2013–2017. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2019;67. - PMC - PubMed
    1. European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction European drug report, 2019. Available: http://www.emcdda.europa.eu/system/files/publications/11364/20191724_TDA...