Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Jul;40(7):997-1006.
doi: 10.1038/s41372-020-0627-z. Epub 2020 Feb 24.

Genetic diagnosis in the fetus

Affiliations
Review

Genetic diagnosis in the fetus

Monica H Wojcik et al. J Perinatol. 2020 Jul.

Abstract

Many genetic disorders are detectable in the prenatal period, and the capacity to identify them has increased remarkably as molecular genetic testing techniques continue to improve and become incorporated into clinical practice. The indications for prenatal genetic testing vary widely, including follow-up of an anomaly found by routine ultrasound or maternal aneuploidy screening, a family history of genetic disease, advanced maternal or paternal age, or evaluation of a low-risk pregnancy due to parental concern. The interpretation of genetic variants identified in the prenatal period poses unique challenges due to the lack of ability for deep phenotyping as well as the option to make critical decisions regarding pregnancy continuation and perinatal management. In this review, we address the various modalities currently available and commonly used for genetic testing, including preimplantation genetic testing of embryos, cell-free DNA testing, and diagnostic procedures such as chorionic villous sampling, amniocentesis, or percutaneous umbilical blood sampling, from which samples may be sent for a wide variety of genetic tests. We discuss the difference between these modalities for the genetic diagnosis of a fetus, their strengths and weaknesses, and strategies for their optimal use in order to direct perinatal care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no competing financial interests relevant to this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Opportunities for prenatal genetic evaluation. IVF, in vitro fertilization; PGT, pre-implantation genetic testing; CVS, chorionic villous sampling; PUBS, percutaneous umbilical blood sampling; cfDNA, cell-free DNA
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Overview of embryonic development and its relevance to prenatal genetic testing. Placental cell lines are demonstrated in italicized font. Testing modalities are encompassed within the text boxes. PGT, pre-implantation genetic testing; cfDNA, cell-free DNA; CVS, chorionic villous sampling. Adapted from [42].

References

    1. Posey JE, O’Donnell-Luria AH, Chong JX, Harel T, Jhangiani SN, Coban Akdemir ZH, et al. Insights into genetics, human biology and disease gleaned from family based genomic studies. Genet Med 2019, 21(4):798–812. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bamshad MJ, Nickerson DA, Chong JX. Mendelian Gene Discovery: Fast and Furious with No End in Sight. Am J Hum Genet 2019, 105(3): 448–455. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boycott KM, Hartley T, Biesecker LG, Gibbs RA, Innes AM, Riess O, et al. A Diagnosis for All Rare Genetic Diseases: The Horizon and the Next Frontiers. Cell 2019, 177(1): 32–37. - PubMed
    1. Yang Y, Muzny DM, Reid JG, Bainbridge MN, Willis A, Ward PA, et al. Clinical whole-exome sequencing for the diagnosis of mendelian disorders. N Engl J Med 2013, 369(16): 1502–1511. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Saunders CJ, Miller NA, Soden SE, Dinwiddie DL, Noll A, Alnadi NA, et al. Rapid whole-genome sequencing for genetic disease diagnosis in neonatal intensive care units. Sci Transl Med 2012, 4(154): 154ra135. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources