Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 1977 Apr;185(4):441-7.
doi: 10.1097/00000658-197704000-00012.

Ultrasound in renal transplantation

Case Reports

Ultrasound in renal transplantation

J Petrek et al. Ann Surg. 1977 Apr.

Abstract

Because of important differences in prognosis and treatment, prompt and accurate diagnosis of fever, decreasing function, and pain and tenderness around a renal allograft is crucial for differentiation between acute rejection and other post-operative conditions which may give a similar picture. Ultrasound examinations within 24 hours have been performed on all transplant recipients exhibiting symtoms compatible on all transplant recipients exhibiting symptoms compatible with an episode of acute rejection between September 1973 and June 1976 at the Peter Bent Brigham Hospital. The patients were separated into four groups dependent upon diagnosis by ultrasound; Group I(73 patients); allograft enlargment consistent with acute rejection; Group II (14 patients); dilitation of the collecting system; Group III (14 patients); perinephric fluid collections; Group IV (6 patients); miscellaneous conditions. The accuracy of the ultrasound technique was compared within each group to the results from intravenous pyelography, retrograde pyelography, serial renograms, kidney biopsy and/or surgical exploration. This convenient, non-invasive and reproducible method has been extremely effective in the differential diagnosis of rejection in clinical transplantation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ann Surg. 1975 Aug;182(2):108-15 - PubMed
    1. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med. 1974 Oct;122(2):308-12 - PubMed
    1. J Urol. 1973 Feb;109(2):173-6 - PubMed
    1. JAMA. 1972 Jan 24;219(4):475-9 - PubMed
    1. Arch Surg. 1972 Jan;104(1):42-5 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources