Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2020 Jan 20;14(1):15-26.
doi: 10.1159/000505482. eCollection 2020 Jan-Apr.

"Obscure" Appendiceal Orifice Polyps Can Be Challenging to Identify by Colonoscopy

Affiliations
Case Reports

"Obscure" Appendiceal Orifice Polyps Can Be Challenging to Identify by Colonoscopy

Afshin Amini et al. Case Rep Gastroenterol. .

Abstract

The primary purpose of screening colonoscopy is the detection and subsequent removal of precancerous polyps. However, effective recognition of appendiceal lesions with a standard endoscope is often challenging and is limited to the base of the cecum and appendiceal orifice. The majority of appendiceal polyps are found incidentally following an appendectomy, though rarely they may be discovered during a colonoscopy. Despite being visualized by colonoscopy, most of these polyps are generally referred for surgical resection. The risk of developing carcinoma in patients with appendiceal polyps is likely similar to that of other colonic polyps, so it is essential for the endoscopist to examine and visualize the appendiceal orifice thoroughly. Various techniques are available to the endoscopist that can increase the accuracy of colonoscopic evaluation. These include luminal inflation and deflation, looking behind and pressing haustral folds, and repetitive passage of the scope over poorly visualized areas. To our knowledge, only 3 cases have been reported in the literature describing the discovery of obscure appendiceal polyps using colonoscopic techniques. Here we describe three cases of appendiceal orifice polyps missed on initial visualization but subsequently protruded into the cecum following prolonged examination and gentle deflation in the cecum. The endoscopist should consider the possibility of an appendiceal neoplasm, especially if other colonic polyps have been found. Endoscopists should spend adequate time examining the cecum during a screening colonoscopy to expose and thoroughly examine the appendiceal region.

Keywords: Appendiceal orifice polyps; Colonoscopy; Obscure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
a Appendiceal orifice. b A 6-mm polyp was found in the appendiceal orifice after air suctioning and mild decompression of the cecum. c Polyp fully exposed (yellow arrow) with a clear stalk (red arrow) using a biopsy forceps. d Tubular adenoma polyp (100×).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
a Appendiceal orifice. b Sessile polyp revealed after cecal deflation (yellow arrow). c Post polypectomy using a snare. d Tubular adenoma polyp (200×).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
a Appendiceal orifice appears normal. b A 5-mm sessile polyp was found at the orifice (yellow arrows) after careful examination. c Post polypectomy using cold forceps. d Sessile serrated adenoma polyp (100×).

References

    1. Emil S, Najib H. Adenoma and Malignant Colorectal Polyp: Pathological Considerations and Clinical Applications. EMJ Gastroenterol. 2018;7((1)):92–102.
    1. Amersi F, Agustin M, Ko CY. Colorectal cancer: epidemiology, risk factors, and health services. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2005 Aug;18((3)):133–40. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rex DK. Still photography versus videotaping for documentation of cecal intubation: A prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000 Apr;51((4 I)):451–459. - PubMed
    1. Cirocco WC, Rusin LC. Factors that predict incomplete colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum. 1995 Sep;38((9)):964–8. - PubMed
    1. Toma A. Colonoscopic Visualization of Benign Polyps in the Appendiceal Region. Gastroenterol Hepatol Open Access. 2016 Dec 15;5((6))

Publication types