Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Aug 17;1(1):82-86.
doi: 10.1159/000479753. eCollection 2017 Sep-Dec.

Need for Digital Biomarkers in Musculoskeletal Trials

Affiliations
Review

Need for Digital Biomarkers in Musculoskeletal Trials

Jörg Goldhahn. Digit Biomark. .

Abstract

Pain and loss of function - both problems cause patients to visit a musculoskeletal specialist. Therefore, both lead symptoms should serve as a benchmark for new therapeutic approaches. New technologies generating digital biomarkers have the potential to significantly change musculoskeletal trials. However, more work is needed to agree upon data and variable standards, to improve user friendliness, and to ensure data integrity along the whole processing way. Therefore, rigorous and systematic testing of new technological approaches is required to establish new outcome variables suitable for musculoskeletal trials. Consortia of researchers working on similar technologies and outcome variables should collaborate from the beginning to enable comparing and pooling data. Early interaction with health authorities and regulatory bodies are necessary to pave the way for a widespread use of a new technology.

Keywords: Digital biomarker; Musculoskeletal trial.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Interest of different stakeholders in the WHO International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), modified after: Towards a Common Language for Functioning, Disability and Health. ICF. Geneva, WHO, 2002. QoL, quality of life.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Difference between self-reported walking and weight training activities and real-world moderate-intensity activity measured with accelerometry in the LIFE study by Pahor et al. [6]; reproduction with permission of Pahor et al.

References

    1. Basch E, Abernethy AP, Reeve BB. Assuring the patient centeredness of patient-reported outcomes: content validity in medical product development and comparative effectiveness research. Value Health. 2011;14:965–966. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Macefield RC, Jacobs M, Korfage IJ, Nicklin J, Whistance RN, Brookes ST, Sprangers MA, Blazeby JM. Developing core outcomes sets: methods for identifying and including patient-reported outcomes (PROs) Trials. 2014;15:49. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nightingale EJ, Pourkazemi F, Hiller CE. Systematic review of timed stair tests. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2014;51:335–350. - PubMed
    1. Bisca GW, Morita AA, Hernandes NA, Probst VS, Pitta F. Simple lower limb functional tests in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96:2221–2230. - PubMed
    1. Peel NM, Kuys SS, Klein K. Gait speed as a measure in geriatric assessment in clinical settings: a systematic review. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2013;68:39–46. - PubMed