Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jun;57(3):821-841.
doi: 10.1007/s13524-020-00859-7.

Intentionally or Ambivalently Risking a Short Interpregnancy Interval: Reproductive-Readiness Factors in Women's Postpartum Non-Use of Contraception

Affiliations

Intentionally or Ambivalently Risking a Short Interpregnancy Interval: Reproductive-Readiness Factors in Women's Postpartum Non-Use of Contraception

Michael S Rendall et al. Demography. 2020 Jun.

Abstract

A focus of research on short interpregnancy intervals (IPI) has been on young disadvantaged women whose births are likely to be unintended. Later initiation of family formation in the United States and other high-income countries points to the need to also consider a woman's attributes indicative of readiness for purposefully accelerated family formation achieved through short IPIs. We test for whether factors indicating "reproductive readiness"-including being married, being older, and having just had a first birth or a birth later than desired-predict a woman's non-use of contraception in the postpartum months. We also test for whether this contraceptive non-use results explicitly from wanting to become pregnant again. The data come from the 2012-2015 Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, representing women who recently gave birth in any of 35 U.S. states and New York City (N = 120,111). We find that these reproductive-readiness factors are highly predictive of women's postpartum non-use of contraception because of a stated desire to become pregnant and are moderately predictive of contraceptive non-use without an explicit pregnancy intention. We conclude that planning for, or ambivalently risking, a short IPI is a frequent family-formation strategy for women whose family formation has been delayed. This is likely to become increasingly common as family formation in the United States is initiated later in the reproductive life course.

Keywords: Birth spacing; Contraception; Fertility timing.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ball SJ, Pereira G, Jacoby P, de Klerk N, and Stanley FJ (2014) Re-evaluation of link between interpregnancy interval and adverse birth outcomes: retrospective cohort study matching two intervals per mother British Medical Journal 349:g4333. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barclay KJ, and Kolk M (2018) Birth Intervals and Health in Adulthood: A Comparison of Siblings Using Swedish Register Data Demography 55(3):929–955. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beaujouan E, and Berghammer C (2019) The gap between lifetime fertility intentions and completed fertility in Europe and the United States Population Research and Policy Review online access.
    1. Boardman LA, Allsworth J, Phipps MG, & Lapane KL (2006). Risk Factors for Unintended Versus Intended Rapid Repeat Pregnancies among Adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 39(4): 597.e1–597.e8 - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2019) “PRAMS” https://www.cdc.gov/prams/prams-data/researchers.htm. Accessed March 29, 2019.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources