Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb 22;9(2):236.
doi: 10.3390/foods9020236.

The Influence of Composition and Manufacturing Approach on the Physical and Rehydration Properties of Milk Protein Concentrate Powders

Affiliations

The Influence of Composition and Manufacturing Approach on the Physical and Rehydration Properties of Milk Protein Concentrate Powders

David J McSweeney et al. Foods. .

Abstract

This study investigated the physical and rehydration properties of milk protein concentrate (MPC) powders with five different protein contents (i.e., 38.9, 53.7, 63.6, 74.1, and 84.7%, w/w) prepared by recombining the ultrafiltration (UF) retentate and UF permeate of skim milk. Powder density and flowability increased, while the powder particle size decreased with decreasing powder protein content. The amount of non-wetting MPC powder decreased with decreasing protein content, demonstrating greater wettability for lower protein powders. At protein contents >65% (w/w), the dispersibility and solubility of the powders decreased significantly, likely due to the greater hydrophobic interactions between casein proteins and a lower concentration of lactose. Therefore, as the protein content of the MPC powders was decreased, their rehydration properties improved. The results obtained in this study provide novel insights into the relationship between the composition of recombined UF retentate and UF permeate streams on the subsequent powder particle size, density, and rehydration properties, and demonstrate that such powders possess similar properties to those prepared using conventional direct membrane filtration.

Keywords: milk protein concentrate powder; rehydration; solubility; spray drying.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Process flow diagram of conventional and novel approaches for the production of milk protein concentrate (MPC) powders.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Particle size distribution of milk protein concentrate (MPC) 85 (■), MPC75 (▲), MPC65 (●), MPC55 (□), and MPC40 (∆) powders.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Scanning electron microscopy images of milk protein concentrate (MPC) 85 (A), MPC75 (B), MPC65 (C), MPC55 (D), and MPC40 (E) powders at 5000× magnification.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Particle size distribution of milk protein concentrate (MPC) 85 (■), MPC75 (▲), MPC65 (●), MPC55 (□), and MPC40 (∆) powders after reconstitution in ultrapure water at (A) 23 °C and (B) 50 °C.

References

    1. Henchion M., Hayes M., Mullen A.M., Fenelon M., Tiwari B. Future protein supply and demand: Strategies and factors influencing a sustainable equilibrium. Foods. 2017;6:53. doi: 10.3390/foods6070053. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Singh H. Interactions of milk proteins during the manufacture of milk powders. Lait. 2007;87:413–423. doi: 10.1051/lait:2007014. - DOI
    1. Huffman L., Harper W.J. Maximizing the value of milk through separation technologies. J. Dairy Sci. 1999;82:2238–2244. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75471-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mistry V.V., Hassan H.N. Delactosed, high milk protein powder. 1. Manufacture and composition. J. Dairy Sci. 1991;74:1163–1169. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78269-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sikand V., Tong P.S., Roy S., Rodriguez-Saona L.E., Murray B.A. Solubility of commercial milk protein concentrates and milk protein isolates. J. Dairy Sci. 2011;94:6194–6202. doi: 10.3168/jds.2011-4477. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources