Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2020 Feb 22;21(4):1499.
doi: 10.3390/ijms21041499.

Identification of MOR-Positive B Cell as Possible Innovative Biomarker (Mu Lympho-Marker) for Chronic Pain Diagnosis in Patients with Fibromyalgia and Osteoarthritis Diseases

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Identification of MOR-Positive B Cell as Possible Innovative Biomarker (Mu Lympho-Marker) for Chronic Pain Diagnosis in Patients with Fibromyalgia and Osteoarthritis Diseases

William Raffaeli et al. Int J Mol Sci. .

Abstract

Fibromyalgia (FM) diagnosis follows the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria, based on clinical evaluation and written questionnaires without any objective diagnostic tool. The lack of specific biomarkers is a tragic aspect for FM and chronic pain diseases in general. Interestingly, the endogenous opioid system is close to the immune one because of the expression of opioid receptors on lymphocytes membrane. Here we analyzed the role of the Mu opioid receptor on B lymphocytes as a specific biomarker for FM and osteoarthritis (OA) patients. We enrolled three groups of females: FM patients, OA patients (chronic pain control group) and healthy subjects (pain-free negative control group). We collected blood samples to apply immunophenotyping analysis. Written tests were administrated for psychological analysis. Data were statistically analyzed. Final results showed that the percentage of Mu-positive B cells were statistically lower in FM and OA patients than in pain-free subjects. A low expression of Mu-positive B cell was not associated with the psychological characteristics investigated. In conclusion, here we propose the percentage of Mu-positive B cells as a biological marker for an objective diagnosis of chronic pain suffering patients, also contributing to the legitimacy of FM as a truly painful disease.

Keywords: chronic pain biomarkers; chronic pain dDiagnosis; fibromyalgia; lymphocytes; opioid receptors; osteoarthritis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow cytometry analysis of the Mu opioid receptor in fibromyalgia (FM), osteoarthritis (OA) and CTRL(−) patients in T lymphocytes (A) and B lymphocytes(C). Mu+ T cells percentage (B) and Mu+ B cells percentage (D) in FM, OA, CTRL(−) patient groups.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) Moderate and severe pain (NRS) FM patients showed a significantly lower % of Mu+ B cells than the negative control group patients. (B) Moderate and severe pain OA patients showed a significantly lower Mu+ B cell percentage than the mild pain OA and negative control group patients; mild pain OA patients and control group did not show any significant differences in the percentage of Mu+ B cells.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Moderate and severe pain (NRS) FM and OA patients did not show any significant difference in Mu+ B cells percentages. Both of the groups expressed Mu+ B cells percentages significatively lower than the negative control group and mild pain OA patients.
Figure 4
Figure 4
(A)FM patients suffering for more than 5 years showed a significantly higher percentage of Mu+ B cells than patients suffering for less than 5 years; the negative control group expressed a Mu+ B cells percentage that was significantly higher than both of the two FM subgroups. (B) OA patients suffering for less than 5 years showed a significantly lower percentage of Mu+ B lymphocytes than the negative control group.

References

    1. Hoffman D.L., Dukes E.M. The health status burden of people with fibromyalgia: A review of studies that assessed health status with the SF-36 or the SF-12. Int. J. Clin. Pract. 2008;62:115–126. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2007.01638.x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Branco J.C., Bannwarth B., Failde I., Abello Carbonell J., Blotman F., Spaeth M., Saraiva F., Nacci F., Thomas E., Caubere J.P., et al. Prevalence of fibromyalgia: A survey in five European countries. Semin. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;39:448–453. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2008.12.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Queiroz L.P. Worldwide epidemiology of fibromyalgia. Curr. Pain Headache Rep. 2013;17:356. doi: 10.1007/s11916-013-0356-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Marques A.P., Santo A., Berssaneti A.A., Matsutani L.A., Yuan S.L.K. Prevalence of fibromyalgia: Literature review update. Rev. Bras. Reum. 2017;57:356–363. doi: 10.1016/j.rbr.2016.10.004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wolfe F., Clauw D.J., Fitzcharles M.A., Goldenberg D.L., Katz R.S., Mease P., Russell A.S., Russell I.J., Winfield J.B., Yunus M.B. The American College of Rheumatology preliminary diagnostic criteria for fibromyalgia and measurement of symptom severity. Arthritis Care Res. 2010;62:600–610. doi: 10.1002/acr.20140. - DOI - PubMed