Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jan-Feb;21(98):35-40.
doi: 10.4103/nah.NAH_38_18.

Assessing Hidden Hearing Loss After Impulse Noise in a Mouse Model

Affiliations

Assessing Hidden Hearing Loss After Impulse Noise in a Mouse Model

Ryan T Harrison et al. Noise Health. 2019 Jan-Feb.

Abstract

Introduction: There are several key differences between impulse and continuous noise: the nature of the noise itself, the cochlear and neuronal structures affected, the severity to which they damage the auditory system, and the period of time in which damage occurs. Notably, no work on hidden hearing loss after impulse noise exposure has been done to this point, though it has been extensively studied after continuous noise. Hidden hearing loss manifests physiologically with reductions in suprathreshold amplitudes of the first wave of the auditory brainstem response, while auditory thresholds can remain relatively normal.

Objective: This study aimed to assess the extent to which, if at all, hidden hearing loss is present after exposure to impulse noise in C57BL6/J mice.

Methods: Thirty-one C57BL6/J mice were used in the experiment, in accordance with IACUC protocols. Auditory brainstem responses were recorded before and after noise exposures. The noise exposures consisted of 500 impulses at 137 dB peSPL.

Results: Suprathreshold amplitude reductions in the P1 wave of the mouse auditory brainstem response were seen, but only at frequencies with significant threshold shift.

Conclusion: These amplitude changes were consistent with hidden hearing loss, and we conclude that impulse noise can cause hidden hearing loss, but future studies are required to determine the specific mechanisms involved and if they parallel those of hidden hearing loss after continuous noise.

Keywords: Auditory brainstem response; cochlea; hidden hearing loss; impulse noise; noise.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
ABR thresholds for the mice before and after impulse noise exposure. Error bars represent ± 1 standard deviation. N = 31 for Pre, Day 3, and Day 7. N = 29 for Day 21. Significant differences between Pre and all other days as well as between Day 3 and Day 21 are shown with an asterisk (*). Significant differences only between Pre and all other days are shown with two asterisks (**).
Figure 2
Figure 2
ABR P1 wave amplitudes for the mice before and after impulse noise exposure. The top, center, and bottom panels represent 8, 16, and 24 kHz data, respectively. Error bars represent ±1 standard deviation. N = 31 for Pre, Day 3, and Day 7. N = 29 for Day 21. Levels at which amplitudes were significantly different between Pre and Day 21 are shown with asterisks (*).

Similar articles

References

    1. Kujawa SG, Liberman MC. Acceleration of age-related hearing loss by early noise exposure: Evidence of a misspent youth. J Neurosci. 2006;26:2115–23. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kujawa SG, Liberman MC. Adding insult to injury: Cochlear nerve degeneration after “temporary” noise-induced hearing loss. J Neurosci. 2009;29:14077–85. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lin HW, Furman AC, Kujawa SG, Liberman MC. Primary neural degeneration in the guinea pig cochlea after reversible noise-induced threshold shift. JARO. 2011;12:605–16. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kujawa SG, Liberman MC. Synaptopathy in the noise-exposed and aging cochlea: Primary neural degeneration in acquired sensorineural hearing loss. Hearing Res. 2015;330:191–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Manchaiah VKC, Zhao F, Danesh AA, Duprey R. The genetic basis of auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD) Int J Pediatr Otorhi. 2011;75:151–8. - PubMed