Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb;74(1):53-58.
doi: 10.18926/AMO/57953.

Robotic Renal Autotransplantation: A Feasibility Study in a Porcine Model

Affiliations
Free article

Robotic Renal Autotransplantation: A Feasibility Study in a Porcine Model

Risa Kubota et al. Acta Med Okayama. 2020 Feb.
Free article

Abstract

We investigated the feasibility of robotic renal autotransplantation (RAT) in a porcine model to reduce invasiveness of RAT. Five pigs underwent robotic RAT using the da Vinci® robotic system. A robotic left nephrectomy was performed in all cases. Robotic RAT was performed on the left side in all but one case. Four ports were used. In 3 cases, the kidney was taken out through the GelPort® and irrigated on ice with Ringer's solution. In 2 cases, a complete intracorporeal robotic RAT was performed. An end-to-side anastomosis was performed between the renal vein and the external iliac vein and between the renal artery and the external iliac artery. Ureteroneocystostomy was also performed in 2 cases. All cases were performed robotically without open conversion. The median (IQR) console time was 3.1 (0.7) h, and the operative time was 3.8 (1.1) h. The estimated blood loss was 30 (0) ml. The warm ischemia time was 4.0 (0.2) min, and the cold ischemia time was 97 (17) min. Intracorporeal transarterial hypothermic renal perfusion was feasible in the 2 complete intracorporeal robotic RAT cases by using a perfusion catheter through a laparoscopic port. Robotic RAT has the potential to be a new minimally invasive substitute for conventional open surgery.

Keywords: porcine model; renal autotransplantation; robotic; transplantation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

References

    1. Bluebond-Langner R, Rha KH, Pinto PA, Varkarakis J, Douyon E, Komotar RJ, Jarrett TW, Kavoussi LR and Molmenti EP: Laparoscopic-assisted renal autotransplantation. Urology (2004) 63: 853-856.
    1. Gordon ZN, Angell J and Abaza R: Completely Intracorporeal Robotic Renal Autotransplantation. J Urol (2014) 192: 1516-1522.
    1. Ratner LE, Kavoussi LR, Schulam PG, Bender JS, Magnuson TH and Montgomery R: Comparison of laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy versus the standard open approach. Transplant Proc (1997) 29: 138-139.
    1. Lee JY, Alzahrani T and Ordon M: Intra-corporeal robotic renal auto-transplantation. Can Urol Assoc J (2015) 9: E748-749.
    1. Gill IS, Uzzo RG, Hobart MG, Streem SB, Goldfarb DA and Noble MJ: Laparoscopic retroperitoneal live donor right nephrectomy for purposes of allotransplantation and autotransplantation. J Urol (2000) 164: 1500-1504.

LinkOut - more resources