Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb 10:19:e00154.
doi: 10.1016/j.plabm.2020.e00154. eCollection 2020 Mar.

Adopting solutions for annotation and reporting of next generation sequencing in clinical practice

Affiliations

Adopting solutions for annotation and reporting of next generation sequencing in clinical practice

Jinming Song et al. Pract Lab Med. .

Erratum in

Abstract

With advancements in the understanding of human cancers (carcinomas, sarcomas, and hematopoietic malignancies), molecular profiling, especially by Next Generation Sequencing (NGS), is playing an increasingly important role in the diagnosis, prognostication, and therapeutic management of cancer patients. The final and critical step in NGS is the annotation of detected variants and reporting of their clinical significance. Automated bioinformatics tools are available to assist with annotation, but the final responsibility for interpretation and validation of the annotation rests with the pathologist who may be constrained by the pressures of clinical sign-out and limited training in NGS. In this manuscript, we detail our experience in outsourcing variant annotation to a high-quality vendor to improve quality, standardize reporting, and decrease turn-around time of NGS reporting in clinical practice. We describe the composition of the evaluation team, steps that should be taken to evaluate potential annotation vendors, and detailed parameters that should be addressed before contracting with a vendor to guarantee the clinical reliability of the reported annotations.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Shukla H.D., Mahmood J., Vujaskovic Z. Integrated proteo-genomic approach for early diagnosis and prognosis of cancer. Canc. Lett. 2015;369(1):28–36. - PubMed
    1. Kamps R. Next-generation sequencing in oncology: genetic diagnosis, risk prediction and cancer classification. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017;18(2) - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bahassi el M., Stambrook P.J. Next-generation sequencing technologies: breaking the sound barrier of human genetics. Mutagenesis. 2014;29(5):303–310. - PMC - PubMed
    1. El-Deiry W.S. The current state of molecular testing in the treatment of patients with solid tumors, 2019. Ca - Cancer J. Clin. 2019 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Morganti S. Complexity of genome sequencing and reporting: next generation sequencing (NGS) technologies and implementation of precision medicine in real life. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 2019;133:171–182. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources