Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb 9:17:100541.
doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2020.100541. eCollection 2020 Mar.

Flexible, rule-based dose escalation: The cohort-sequence design

Affiliations

Flexible, rule-based dose escalation: The cohort-sequence design

Shuang Li et al. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Phase I oncology trials seek to acquire preliminary information on the safety of novel treatments. In current practice, most such trials employ rule-based designs that determine whether to escalate the dose using data from the current dose only. The most popular of these, the 3 + 3, is simple and familiar but inflexible and inefficient. We propose a rule-based design that addresses these deficiencies. Our method, which we denote the cohort-sequence design, is defined by a sequence of J increasing cohort sizes n = ( n 1 , , n J ) and corresponding critical values b = ( b 1 , , b J ) . The idea is to begin with a small cohort size n 1 and escalate through the planned doses, increasing the cohort size when we encounter toxicities. By selection of J and a safety threshold tuning parameter θ, one can create a design that will efficiently identify a target toxicity rate, potentially including a built-in dose-expansion cohort. We compared our designs to the 3 + 3 under a range of toxicity scenarios, observing that our approach generally rapidly identifies an MTD without enrolling patients unnecessarily at low doses where both toxicity and response rates are likely to be low. We have implemented the design in the R package cohortsequence.

Keywords: Dose-expansion cohort; Dose-finding design; Drug safety; Phase I clinical trial.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart for the cohort-sequence design.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Flow chart for determining the cohort size based on specified DLTs (X), under safety threshold θ.

References

    1. Le Tourneau C., Lee J.J., Siu L.L. Dose escalation methods in phase I cancer clinical trials. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2009;101:708–720. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Braun T.M. The current design of oncology phase I clinical trials: progressing from algorithms to statistical models. Chin. Clin. Oncol. 2014;3 - PubMed
    1. Ji Y., Liu P., Li Y., Nebiyou Bekele B. A modified toxicity probability interval method for dose-finding trials. Clin. Trials. 2010;7:653–663. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wheeler G.M., Sweeting M.J., Mander A.P. AplusB: a web application for investigating A+B designs for phase I cancer clinical trials. PloS One. 2016;11 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ji Y., Wang S.J. Modified toxicity probability interval design: a safer and more reliable method than the 3+3 design for practical phase I trials. J. Clin. Oncol. 2013;31:1785–1791. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources