Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Jun;16(4):438-451.
doi: 10.1002/ieam.4256. Epub 2020 May 1.

Methodologies and Management Framework for Restoration of Wetland Hydrologic Connectivity: A Synthesis

Affiliations
Review

Methodologies and Management Framework for Restoration of Wetland Hydrologic Connectivity: A Synthesis

Bo Meng et al. Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2020 Jun.

Abstract

Under the dual influences of high-intensity anthropogenic activity and climate change, wetland hydrologic connectivity (HC) has decreased significantly, resulting in the severe fragmentation of wetlands, a decrease in wetland area, and a degradation of hydrological functions, resulting in a worsening disaster response to floods and droughts. Dynamic changes in wetland HC are affected by a variety of factors. Many degraded wetlands have undergone measures to restore HC. Recovery can improve the HC pattern of degraded wetlands. Based on the knowledge of practitioners and a review of the literature, it was found that recovery measures can be divided into structural recovery and functional recovery according to the specific recovery objectives. However, the current recovery method lacks a holistic analysis of the HC pattern. To this end, we propose a hydrologic network-water balance-based HC recovery and management framework that overcomes the limitations of single-drive-factor repair and local repair effects. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2020;16:438-451. © 2020 SETAC.

Keywords: Management framework; Network-water balance; Restoration; Wetland hydrologic connectivity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

REFERENCES

    1. 92nd United States Congress. 1972. Federal Water Pollution Control Amendments of 1972 (CWA/Clean Water Act). Pub L 92-500.
    1. Alexander LC, Fritz KM, Schofield KA, Autrey BC, DeMeester JE, Golden HE, Goodrich DC, Kepner WG, Kiperwas HR, Lane CR et al. 2018. Featured collection introduction: Connectivity of streams and wetlands to downstream waters. J Am Water Resour Assoc 54(2):287-297. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12630
    1. Ali A. 2015. Multi-objective operations of multi-wetland ecosystem: iModel applied to the Everglades restoration. J Water Res Plan Man 141(9):04015008. http://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/%28ASCE%29WR.1943-5452.0000511
    1. Bernhardt ES, Palmer MA, Allan JD, Alexander G, Barnas K, Brooks S, Carr J, Clayton S, Dahm C, Follstad-Shah J et al. 2005. Ecology-synthesizing US river restoration efforts. Science 308:636-637.
    1. Besacier-Monbertrand AL, Paillex A, Castella E. 2014. Short-term impacts of lateral hydrological connectivity restoration on aquatic macroinvertebrates. River Res Appl 30(5):557-570. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.2597

LinkOut - more resources