The learning curve of one anastomosis gastric bypass and its impact as a preceding procedure to Roux-en Y gastric bypass: initial experience of one hundred and five consecutive cases
- PMID: 32101137
- PMCID: PMC7045633
- DOI: 10.1186/s12893-020-00697-9
The learning curve of one anastomosis gastric bypass and its impact as a preceding procedure to Roux-en Y gastric bypass: initial experience of one hundred and five consecutive cases
Abstract
Background: The aim of this study was to assess the learning curve of one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB-MGB) at the start of a low volume bariatric unit and analyze its impact as a preceding procedure to Roux-en Y gastric bypass (RYGB).
Methods: From January 2014 to December 2017, all patients who underwent bariatric surgeries in our teaching hospital that were performed by the same surgeon were enrolled. The first 47 patients who underwent OAGB-MGB were assigned to group A. RYGB has been offered as a treatment option since July 2016; thereafter, 26 patients who underwent OAGB-MGB and 32 patients who underwent RYGB at the same time interval were assigned to group B and group C, respectively. Baseline characteristics, perioperative outcomes and percentage of total weight loss (%TWL) up to 12 months postoperatively were collected and analyzed between groups.
Results: Compared to the patients in group C, those in groups A and B were older (39.4 yrs. and 42.2 yrs., respectively, vs. 34.2 yrs.; p = 0.021) and predominantly male (48.9 and 73.1%, respectively vs. 40.6%; p = 0.04), and they had a higher body mass index (41.8 kg/m2 and 43.3 kg/m2, respectively vs. 37.7 kg/m2; p = 0.002) and a higher incidence of hypertension (44.7 and 61.5%, respectively vs. 21.9%; p = 0.008). In addition, the operation time was significantly reduced (118.2 min and 115.8 min, respectively vs. 153.1 min; p < 0.001), and the length of stay was shortened (3.0 days and 2.9 days, respectively vs. 3.4 days; p = 0.002) in groups B and C compared to group A. No mortality, conversion or leakage was reported throughout the study period. The 30-day complication rate was decreased in group C compared to groups A and B (0% vs. 6.4 and 7.7%, respectively; p = 0.307). The %TWL at the 12-month follow-up was 36.3, 30.9 and 28.3% for groups A, B and C, respectively (p < 0.001).
Conclusion: Our study verified the early emergence of a learning curve effect for OAGB-MGB, and the proficiency acquired can be transferred to subsequent practice for RYGB in terms of acceptable operation time and length of stay without an increase in complications.
Keywords: Obesity; One anastomosis gastric bypass; Roux-en Y gastric bypass.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests
Similar articles
-
Management of super-super obese patients: comparison between one anastomosis (mini) gastric bypass and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.Surg Endosc. 2017 Sep;31(9):3504-3509. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5376-x. Epub 2016 Dec 15. Surg Endosc. 2017. PMID: 27981383
-
One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass-Mini-Gastric Bypass (OAGB-MGB) Versus Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB)-a Mid-Term Cohort Study with 612 Patients.Obes Surg. 2020 Apr;30(4):1230-1240. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-04250-3. Obes Surg. 2020. PMID: 31758474
-
Conversion of one-anastomosis gastric bypass to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: short-term results from a tertiary referral center.Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019 Nov;15(11):1896-1902. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2019.09.059. Epub 2019 Sep 11. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019. PMID: 31611182
-
Randomized Controlled Trial of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Versus Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass for Obesity: Comparison of the YOMEGA and Taiwan Studies.Obes Surg. 2019 Sep;29(9):3047-3053. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-04065-2. Obes Surg. 2019. PMID: 31290104 Review.
-
One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Versus Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass for Morbid Obesity: an Updated Meta-Analysis.Obes Surg. 2019 Sep;29(9):2721-2730. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-04005-0. Obes Surg. 2019. PMID: 31172454
Cited by
-
Comparative Study for Safety and Efficacy of OAGB and SADJB-SG: A Retrospective Study.Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2024 Sep 19;17:3499-3508. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S484616. eCollection 2024. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2024. PMID: 39319304 Free PMC article.
-
Technical Variations and Considerations around OAGB in IFSO-APC and IFSO-MENAC Chapters, an Expert Survey.Obes Surg. 2024 Jun;34(6):2054-2065. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07239-9. Epub 2024 Apr 25. Obes Surg. 2024. PMID: 38662251
-
Reappraisal learning curve of laparoscopic Roux-en Y gastric bypass: retrospective results of one hundred and eight cases from a low-volume unit.BMC Surg. 2021 Feb 15;21(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01058-w. BMC Surg. 2021. PMID: 33588802 Free PMC article.
-
Safety and efficacy of OAGB/MGB during the learning curve: setting a benchmark in a bariatric center of excellence.Updates Surg. 2023 Jan;75(1):169-174. doi: 10.1007/s13304-022-01380-9. Epub 2022 Sep 28. Updates Surg. 2023. PMID: 36169887 Free PMC article.
-
Revisional Surgery of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass for Severe Protein-Energy Malnutrition.Nutrients. 2022 Jun 6;14(11):2356. doi: 10.3390/nu14112356. Nutrients. 2022. PMID: 35684155 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Ng M, Fleming T, Robinson M, Thomson B, Graetz N, Margono C, Mullany EC, Biryukov S, Abbafati C, Abera SF, et al. Global, regional, and national prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and adults during 1980-2013: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2013. Lancet. 2014;384(9945):766–781. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60460-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Sanchez-Santos R, Estevez S, Tome C, Gonzalez S, Brox A, Nicolas R, Crego R, Pinon M, Masdevall C, Torres A. Training programs influence in the learning curve of laparoscopic gastric bypass for morbid obesity: a systematic review. Obes Surg. 2012;22(1):34–41. doi: 10.1007/s11695-011-0398-x. - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials