Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb 26;20(1):47.
doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-00966-3.

No radiographic index predicts difficult intubation using the Optiscope™ in cervical spine surgery patients: a retrospective study

Affiliations

No radiographic index predicts difficult intubation using the Optiscope™ in cervical spine surgery patients: a retrospective study

Hyongmin Oh et al. BMC Anesthesiol. .

Abstract

Background: The Optiscope™ can be used for intubation with minimal neck motion. We retrospectively investigated radiographic predictors of difficult intubation using the Optiscope™ by analyzing preoperative radiographic images.

Methods: One hundred eighty-four patients who were intubated with the Optiscope™ under manual in-line cervical stabilization for cervical spine surgery were enrolled. Radiographic indices were measured on preoperative cervical spine lateral X-ray and magnetic resonance imaging images. Difficult intubation was defined as failure or time consumption more than 90 s on the first attempt. To identify significant predictors of difficult intubation using the Optiscope™ and evaluate their diagnostic value, multivariable logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic analyses were used.

Results: Fourty-seven patients showed difficult intubation. There was no significant difference in radiographic indices between the difficult and easy intubation groups, but higher body mass index (BMI) (26.5 [3.0] vs. 24.6 [3.5] kg/m2, P = 0.001), shorter sternomental distance (SMD) (122.0 [104.0 to 150.0] vs. 150.0 [130.0 to 170.0] mm, P = 0.001), shorter interincisor gap (40.0 [35.0 to 45.0] vs. 43.0 [40.0 to 50.0] mm, P = 0.006), and higher incidence of excessive oral secretions (10.6% vs. 2.9%, P = 0.049) were observed in patients with difficult intubation. In multivariable analysis, BMI (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]; 1.15 [1.03 to 1.28], P = 0.011) and SMD (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]; 0.98 [0.97 to 1.00], P = 0.008) were associated with difficult intubation with the Optiscope™. In receiver operating characterstic analysis, the area under the curve for body mass index was 0.68 (95% confidence interval; 0.60 to 0.77, P < 0.001) and that for sternomental distance was 0.66 (95% confience interval; 0.57 to 0.75, P = 0.001).

Conclusions: The incidence of difficult intubation using the Optiscope™ under manual in-line cervical stabilization was 25.5% in cervical spine surgery patients. No significant predictor of difficult intubation with the Optiscope™ was identified among the measured radiographic indices. Although high BMI and short SMD were predictive of difficult intubation with the Optiscope™, their discrimination power was weak.

Keywords: Cervical spine surgery; Difficult intubation; Optiscope™; Predictor; Videostylet.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The Optiscope™ used in this study. This videostylet has a rigid stylet that angled 90 degrees,with a camera lens at the bottome end and a handle and monitor at the top end
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
CONSORT flow diagram
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Measurements of radiographic indices investigated in this study. Radiographic indices were measured on cervical spine lateral X-ray (a and b) and magnetic resonance imaging (c and d) images in neutral neck position. I. incisor; C1, atlas; C5, the 5th cervical spine; MHD, mandibulohyoid distance; C1C5D, atlanto-the 5th cervical vertebral distance; C1OD, atlanto-occipital distance; HCD, hyoidocervical distance; C1C2D, atlanto-axial distance; SVD, skin-vallecular distance; SED, skin-epiglottic distance; SGD, skin-glottic distance; TL, tongue length; TH, tongue height; TA: tongue area; EL, epiglottis length; EPD, epiglottic-pharyngeal distance, EA, epiglottis angle

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Austin N, Krishnamoorthy V, Dagal A. Airway management in cervical spine injury. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2014;4:50–56. doi: 10.4103/2229-5151.128013. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yuk M, Yeo W, Lee K, Ko J, Park T. Cervical collar makes difficult airway: a simulation study using the LEMON criteria. Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2018;5:22–28. doi: 10.15441/ceem.16.185. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hastings RH, Wood PR. Head extension and laryngeal view during laryngoscopy with cervical spine stabilization maneuvers. Anesthesiology. 1994;80:825–831. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199404000-00015. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nam K, Lee Y, Park HP, Chung J, Yoon HK, Kim TK. Cervical spine motion during tracheal intubation using an Optiscope versus the McGrath Videolaryngoscope in patients with simulated cervical immobilization: a prospective randomized crossover study. Anesth Analg. 2019;129:1666–1672. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003635. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Turkstra TP, Craen RA, Pelz DM, Gelb AW. Cervical spine motion: a fluoroscopic comparison during intubation with lighted stylet, GlideScope, and Macintosh laryngoscope. Anesth Analg. 2005;101:910–915. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000166975.38649.27. - DOI - PubMed