No radiographic index predicts difficult intubation using the Optiscope™ in cervical spine surgery patients: a retrospective study
- PMID: 32101151
- PMCID: PMC7043025
- DOI: 10.1186/s12871-020-00966-3
No radiographic index predicts difficult intubation using the Optiscope™ in cervical spine surgery patients: a retrospective study
Abstract
Background: The Optiscope™ can be used for intubation with minimal neck motion. We retrospectively investigated radiographic predictors of difficult intubation using the Optiscope™ by analyzing preoperative radiographic images.
Methods: One hundred eighty-four patients who were intubated with the Optiscope™ under manual in-line cervical stabilization for cervical spine surgery were enrolled. Radiographic indices were measured on preoperative cervical spine lateral X-ray and magnetic resonance imaging images. Difficult intubation was defined as failure or time consumption more than 90 s on the first attempt. To identify significant predictors of difficult intubation using the Optiscope™ and evaluate their diagnostic value, multivariable logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic analyses were used.
Results: Fourty-seven patients showed difficult intubation. There was no significant difference in radiographic indices between the difficult and easy intubation groups, but higher body mass index (BMI) (26.5 [3.0] vs. 24.6 [3.5] kg/m2, P = 0.001), shorter sternomental distance (SMD) (122.0 [104.0 to 150.0] vs. 150.0 [130.0 to 170.0] mm, P = 0.001), shorter interincisor gap (40.0 [35.0 to 45.0] vs. 43.0 [40.0 to 50.0] mm, P = 0.006), and higher incidence of excessive oral secretions (10.6% vs. 2.9%, P = 0.049) were observed in patients with difficult intubation. In multivariable analysis, BMI (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]; 1.15 [1.03 to 1.28], P = 0.011) and SMD (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]; 0.98 [0.97 to 1.00], P = 0.008) were associated with difficult intubation with the Optiscope™. In receiver operating characterstic analysis, the area under the curve for body mass index was 0.68 (95% confidence interval; 0.60 to 0.77, P < 0.001) and that for sternomental distance was 0.66 (95% confience interval; 0.57 to 0.75, P = 0.001).
Conclusions: The incidence of difficult intubation using the Optiscope™ under manual in-line cervical stabilization was 25.5% in cervical spine surgery patients. No significant predictor of difficult intubation with the Optiscope™ was identified among the measured radiographic indices. Although high BMI and short SMD were predictive of difficult intubation with the Optiscope™, their discrimination power was weak.
Keywords: Cervical spine surgery; Difficult intubation; Optiscope™; Predictor; Videostylet.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Radiographic Predictors of Difficult McGrath MAC Videolaryngoscopy in Patient Undergoing Cervical Spine Surgery.J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2022 Jan 1;34(1):57-63. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0000000000000717. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2022. PMID: 32658098
-
Radiological indicators to predict the application of assistant intubation techniques for patients undergoing cervical surgery.BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 Sep 17;20(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-01153-0. BMC Anesthesiol. 2020. PMID: 32943014 Free PMC article.
-
Radiographic comparison of cervical spine motion using LMA Fastrach, LMA CTrach, and the Macintosh laryngoscope.Turk J Med Sci. 2019 Dec 16;49(6):1681-1686. doi: 10.3906/sag-1906-135. Turk J Med Sci. 2019. PMID: 31655513 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Airway management for cervical spine surgery.Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2016 Mar;30(1):13-25. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2016.01.001. Epub 2016 Jan 22. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2016. PMID: 27036600 Review.
-
Manual in-line stabilization for acute airway management of suspected cervical spine injury: historical review and current questions.Ann Emerg Med. 2007 Sep;50(3):236-45. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.01.009. Epub 2007 Mar 6. Ann Emerg Med. 2007. PMID: 17337093 Review.
Cited by
-
The effects of backward, upward, rightward pressure maneuver for intubation using the OptiscopeTM: a retrospective study.Anesth Pain Med (Seoul). 2021 Oct;16(4):391-397. doi: 10.17085/apm.21026. Epub 2021 Oct 22. Anesth Pain Med (Seoul). 2021. PMID: 35139622 Free PMC article.
-
Which test best predicts difficult endotracheal intubation? A prospective cohort study.Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2023 Apr;29(4):477-485. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2022.34460. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2023. PMID: 36995200 Free PMC article.
-
Success Rate of Endotracheal Intubation Using Inline Stabilization with and without Cervical Hard Collar; a Comparative Study.Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2020 Oct 10;8(1):e81. eCollection 2020. Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2020. PMID: 33244516 Free PMC article.
-
Preoperative radiological indicators for prediction of difficult laryngoscopy in patients with atlantoaxial dislocation.Heliyon. 2023 Dec 9;10(1):e23435. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23435. eCollection 2024 Jan 15. Heliyon. 2023. PMID: 38148803 Free PMC article.
-
Trends in Preoperative Airway Assessment.Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Mar 13;14(6):610. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14060610. Diagnostics (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38535030 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Nam K, Lee Y, Park HP, Chung J, Yoon HK, Kim TK. Cervical spine motion during tracheal intubation using an Optiscope versus the McGrath Videolaryngoscope in patients with simulated cervical immobilization: a prospective randomized crossover study. Anesth Analg. 2019;129:1666–1672. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003635. - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous