Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2020 Feb 5;3(2):e200020.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.0020.

A Comparison of Hospitalized Patients With Heart Failure and Cancer Referred to Palliative Care

Affiliations
Comparative Study

A Comparison of Hospitalized Patients With Heart Failure and Cancer Referred to Palliative Care

Albert Y Liu et al. JAMA Netw Open. .

Abstract

Importance: Growing evidence shows that palliative care (PC) improves treatment outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF), but few large-scale studies have prospectively evaluated the processes and outcomes associated with PC consultation for such patients in the real world.

Objective: To characterize processes and outcomes of PC consultations for hospitalized patients with HF compared with patients with cancer.

Design, setting, and participants: This cohort study of inpatient encounters at community and academic hospitals in the Palliative Care Quality Network enrolled participants between 2013 and 2017. Of a total of 135 197 patients, 57 272 adults with a primary diagnosis of HF or cancer receiving PC consultation were enrolled. Data analysis was performed from April 2018 to December 2019.

Exposures: Primary diagnosis of HF or cancer.

Main outcomes and measures: Symptom improvement and changes in care planning documentation after PC consultation.

Results: At the time of consultation, patients with HF were older (mean age, 75.3 years [95% CI, 75.0-75.5 years] vs 65.2 years [95% CI, 65.0-65.3 years]; P < .001), had lower Palliative Performance Scale scores (mean, 35.6% [95% CI, 35.3%-35.9%] vs 42.4% [95% CI, 42.2%-42.6%]; P < .001), and were more likely to be in a critical care unit (5808 of 16 741 patients [35.3%] vs 4985 of 40 531 patients [12.5%]; P < .001) or a telemetry or step-down unit (5802 of 16 741 patients [35.2%] vs 7651 of 40 531 patients [19.2%]; P < .001) compared with patients with cancer. Patients with HF were less likely than patients with cancer to be referred to PC within 24 hours of admission (6773 of 16 741 patients [41.2%] vs 19 348 of 40 531 patients [49.0%]; P < .001) and had longer hospitalizations before receiving PC consultation requests (mean, 4.6 days [95% CI, 4.4-4.8 days] vs 3.9 days [95% CI, 3.8-4.0 days]; P < .001). Patients with HF were referred less frequently for symptoms other than pain (1686 of 16 488 patients [10.2%] vs 8587 of 39 609 patients [21.7%]; P < .001), but were equally likely to report improvements in anxiety (odds ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.71-1.02; P = .08) and more likely to report improvements in dyspnea (odds ratio, 2.17; 95% CI, 1.83-2.57; P < .001) compared with patients with cancer. Patients with HF were less likely than those with cancer to be discharged alive (odds ratio, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.64-0.96; P = .02) or to be referred to hospice (odds ratio, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.47-0.53; P < .001).

Conclusions and relevance: These findings suggest that PC referral comes late for patients with HF and is used primarily to discuss care planning. Practitioners caring for patients with HF should consider involving PC experts earlier for symptom management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Pantilat reported receiving grants from the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, Cambia Health Foundation, National Institute of Nursing Research, and Hellman Family Foundation during the conduct of the study. Dr Pantilat is the director of the Palliative Care Quality Network. No other disclosures were reported.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B, et al. ; American College of Cardiology Foundation; American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines . 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62(16):-. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2013.05.019 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Curtis LH, Greiner MA, Hammill BG, et al. . Early and long-term outcomes of heart failure in elderly persons, 2001-2005. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(22):2481-2488. doi:10.1001/archinte.168.22.2481 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Heidenreich PA, Albert NM, Allen LA, et al. ; American Heart Association Advocacy Coordinating Committee; Council on Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis and Vascular Biology; Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention; Council on Clinical Cardiology; Council on Epidemiology and Prevention; Stroke Council . Forecasting the impact of heart failure in the United States: a policy statement from the American Heart Association. Circ Heart Fail. 2013;6(3):606-619. doi:10.1161/HHF.0b013e318291329a - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bekelman DB, Havranek EP, Becker DM, et al. . Symptoms, depression, and quality of life in patients with heart failure. J Card Fail. 2007;13(8):643-648. doi:10.1016/j.cardfail.2007.05.005 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Solano JP, Gomes B, Higginson IJ. A comparison of symptom prevalence in far advanced cancer, AIDS, heart disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and renal disease. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2006;31(1):58-69. doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2005.06.007 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types