Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2020 Feb 5;3(2):e200049.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.0049.

Systematic Dementia Screening by Multidisciplinary Team Meetings in Nursing Homes for Reducing Emergency Department Transfers: The IDEM Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Systematic Dementia Screening by Multidisciplinary Team Meetings in Nursing Homes for Reducing Emergency Department Transfers: The IDEM Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial

Yves Rolland et al. JAMA Netw Open. .

Abstract

Importance: Dementia is often underdiagnosed in nursing homes (NHs). This potentially results in inappropriate care, and high rates of emergency department (ED) transfers in particular.

Objective: To assess whether systematic dementia screening of NH residents combined with multidisciplinary team meetings resulted in a lower rate of ED transfer at 12 months compared with usual care.

Design, setting, and participants: Multicenter, cluster randomized trial with NHs as the unit of randomization. The IDEM (Impact of Systematic Tracking of Dementia Cases on the Rate of Hospitalization in Emergency Care Units) trial took place at 64 public and private NHs in France. Recruitment started on May 1, 2010, and was completed on March 31, 2012. Residents who were aged 60 years or older, had no diagnosed or documented dementia, were not bedridden, had lived in the NH for at least 1 month at inclusion, and had a life expectancy greater than 12 months were included. The residents were followed up for 18 months. The main study analyses were completed on October 14, 2016.

Intervention: Two parallel groups were compared: an intervention group consisting of NHs that set up 2 multidisciplinary team meetings to identify residents with dementia and to discuss an appropriate care plan, and a control group consisting of NHs that continued their usual practice. During the inclusion period of 23 months, all residents of participating NHs who met eligibility criteria were included in the study.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary end point (ED transfer) was analyzed at 12 months, but the residents included were followed up for 18 months.

Results: A total of 64 NHs participated in the study and enrolled 1428 residents (mean [SD] age, 84.7 [8.1] years; 1019 [71.3%] female): 599 in the intervention group (32 NHs) and 829 in the control group (32 NHs). The final study visit was completed by 1042 residents (73.0%). The main reason for early discontinuation was death (318 residents [22.7%]). The intervention did not reduce the risk of ED transfers during the 12-month follow-up: the proportion of residents transferred at least once to an ED during the 12-month follow-up was 16.2% in the intervention group vs 12.8% in the control group (odds ratio, 1.32; 95% CI, 0.83-2.09; P = .24).

Conclusions and relevance: This study failed to demonstrate that systematic screening for dementia in NHs resulted in fewer ED transfers. The findings do not support implementation of multidisciplinary team meetings for systematic dementia screening of all NH residents, beyond the national recommendations for dementia diagnosis, to reduce ED transfers.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01569997.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Andrieu reported receiving grants from EU-FP7, EU-H2020, and EU-JPND; grants and personal fees from Nestle; an award from Harmonie Mutuelle; and an education grant from MSD outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure.
Figure.. Study Flowchart
Additional detail is shown in the eFigure in Supplement 2. ITT indicates intention-to-treat; NH, nursing home; and PP, per-protocol.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Livingston G, Sommerlad A, Orgeta V, et al. . Dementia prevention, intervention, and care. Lancet. 2017;390(10113):-. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31363-6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cherubini A, Ruggiero C, Dell’Aquila G, et al. . Underrecognition and undertreatment of dementia in Italian nursing homes. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2012;13(8):759.e7-759.e13. doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2012.05.015 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Magsi H, Malloy T. Underrecognition of cognitive impairment in assisted living facilities. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(2):295-298. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53117.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rolland Y, Andrieu S, Crochard A, Goni S, Hein C, Vellas B. Psychotropic drug consumption at admission and discharge of nursing home residents. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2012;13(4):407.e7-407.e12. doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2011.12.056 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gordon M, Klapecki KC, Wilson DB. Emergency care and the patient in the long-term care facility. CMAJ. 1991;145(1):19-21. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data