Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2020 Feb 27;2(2):CD011019.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011019.pub3.

Telerehabilitation for people with low vision

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Telerehabilitation for people with low vision

Ava K Bittner et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Update in

  • Telerehabilitation for people with low vision.
    Bittner AK, Yoshinaga PD, Rittiphairoj T, Li T. Bittner AK, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 13;1(1):CD011019. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011019.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023. PMID: 36637057 Free PMC article.

Abstract

Background: Low vision affects over 300 million people worldwide and can compromise both activities of daily living and quality of life. Rehabilitative training and vision assistive equipment (VAE) may help, but some visually impaired people have limited resources to attend in-person visits at rehabilitation clinics to receive training to learn to use VAE. These people may be able to overcome barriers to care through remote, Internet-based consultation (i.e. telerehabilitation).

Objectives: To compare the effects of telerehabilitation with face-to-face (e.g. in-office or inpatient) vision rehabilitation services for improving vision-related quality of life and near reading ability in people with visual function loss due to any ocular condition. Secondary objectives were to evaluate compliance with scheduled rehabilitation sessions, abandonment rates for VAE devices, and patient satisfaction ratings.

Search methods: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register) (2019, Issue 6); Ovid MEDLINE; Embase.com; PubMed; ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). We did not use any language restriction or study design filter in the electronic searches; however, we restricted the searches from 1980 onwards because the Internet was not introduced to the public until 1982. We last searched the electronic databases on 24 June 2019.

Selection criteria: We planned to include randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or controlled clinical trials (CCTs) in which participants diagnosed with low vision were undergoing low vision rehabilitation using an Internet, web-based technology compared with an approach involving in-person consultations.

Data collection and analysis: Two review authors independently screened titles and abstracts and then full-text articles against the eligibility criteria. We planned to have two review authors independently abstract data from the included studies. Any discrepancies were resolved by discussion.

Main results: We identified two ongoing studies, but did not find any completed RCTs and CCTs that met the inclusion criteria for this review. We did not conduct a quantitative analysis. We discussed review articles on telemedicine for facilitating communication with elderly individuals or for providing remote ophthalmological care.

Authors' conclusions: We did not find any evidence from RCTs or CCTs on the efficacy of using telerehabilitation for remote delivery of rehabilitation services to individuals with low vision. Given the disease burden and the growing interest in telemedicine, the two ongoing studies, when completed, may provide evidence in understanding the potential for telerehabilitation as a platform for providing services to people with low vision.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

One reason for conducting this systematic review was to establish the knowledge base for designing a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of telerehabilitation for a primarily elderly, visually impaired population. Along with this systematic review, Dr Tianjing Li has received funding to collect pilot data to demonstrate the feasibility of using telerehabilitation as a platform for delivering low‐vision rehabilitation services. The systematic review and the pilot data collected will lay the foundation for preparing a randomized controlled trial application. Dr. Bittner has received funding from the National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, the American Academy of Optometry, and Envision Research Institute to conduct pilot studies of telerehabiliation for low vision.

PDY and SLW have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

1
1
Study flow diagram.

Update of

Similar articles

Cited by

References

References to studies excluded from this review

Aimola 2014 {published data only}
    1. Aimola L, Lane AR, Smith DT, Kerkhoff G, Ford GA, Schenk T. Efficacy and feasibility of home‐based training for individuals with homonymous visual field defects. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 2014;28(3):207‐18. - PubMed
Arnold 2002 {published data only}
    1. Arnold RW. Use of a consumer video system to enhance low vision in children and adults. Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus 2002;39(4):245‐7. - PubMed
Bai 2007 {published data only}
    1. Bai VT, Murali V, Kim R, Srivatsa SK. Teleophthalmology‐based rural eye care in India. Telemedicine and e‐Health 2007;13(3):313‐21. - PubMed
Beumer 2000 {published data only}
    1. Beumer JJ, Haan A, Ven J. Implications of computer‐mediated communication for people who are visually impaired in dealing with complex visualization tasks. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness 2000;94(7):453‐6.
Bittner 2018 {published data only}
    1. Bittner AK, Succar T, Bowers A, Yoshinaga P, Shepherd J, Jacobson A, et al. Low vision patients' satisfaction with telerehabilitation encounters. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2017; Vol. 58, issue 8. [iovs.arvojournals.org/article.aspx?articleid=2639270]
    1. Bittner AK, Yoshinaga P, Bowers A, Shepherd JD, Succar T, Ross NC. Feasibility of telerehabilitation for low vision: satisfaction ratings by providers and patients. Optometry and Vision Science 2018;95(9):865‐72. - PubMed
    1. Ross N, Yoshinaga P, Bowers A, Succar T, Shepherd J, Bittner AK. Providers' ratings of their experiences with delivering remote telerehabilitation services to low vision patients. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2017; Vol. 58, issue 8. [iovs.arvojournals.org/article.aspx?articleid=2640637]
Chee 2018 {published data only}
    1. Chee RI, Darwish D, Fernandez‐Vega A, Patel S, Jonas K, Ostmo S, et al. Retinal telemedicine. Current Ophthalmology Reports 2018;6(1):36‐45. - PMC - PubMed
CITT 2008 {published data only}
    1. Convergence Insufficiency Treatment Trial Study Group. Randomized clinical trial of treatments for symptomatic convergence insufficiency in children. Archives of Ophthalmology 2008;126(10):1336‐49. - PMC - PubMed
CITT 2009 {published data only}
    1. Convergence Insufficiency Treatment Trial Study Group. Long‐term effectiveness of treatments for symptomatic convergence insufficiency in children. Optometry and Vision Science 2009;86(9):1096‐103. - PMC - PubMed
Gall 2012 {published data only}
    1. Gall C, Sabel BA. Reading performance after vision rehabilitation of subjects with homonymous visual field defects. PM&R: the Journal of Injury, Function, and Rehabilitation 2012;4(12):928‐35. - PubMed
Gell 2013 {published data only}
    1. Gell NM, Rosenberg DE, Demiris G, Lacroix AZ, Patel KV. Patterns of technology use among older adults with and without disabilities. Gerontologist 2015;55(3):412‐21. - PMC - PubMed
George 2011 {published data only}
    1. George S, Hayes A, Chen C, Crotty M. The effect of static scanning and mobility training on mobility in people with hemianopia after stroke: a randomized controlled trial comparing standardized versus non‐standardized treatment protocols. BMC Neurology 2011;11(87):1‐6. - PMC - PubMed
Girdler 2010 {published data only}
    1. Girdler SJ, Boldy DP, Dhaliwal SS, Crowley M, Packer TL. Vision self‐management for older adults: a randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Ophthalmology 2010;94(2):223‐8. - PubMed
Herzer 2016 {published data only}
    1. Herzer KR. Moving from disability to possibility. JAMA 2016;316(17):1767‐8. - PMC - PubMed
Ihrig 2019 {published data only}
    1. Ihrig C. Travel cost savings and practicality for low‐vision telerehabilitation. Telemedicine and e‐Health 2019;25(7):649‐54. - PubMed
Jacobson 2005 {published data only}
    1. Jacobson WH. Transforming a traditional personnel preparation program in orientation and mobility into an online program at the University of Arkansas at Little Rock. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness 2005;99(11):707‐11.
Jeon 2012 {published data only}
    1. Jeon ST, Maurer D, Lewis TL. The effect of video game training on the vision of adults with bilateral deprivation amblyopia. Seeing and Perceiving 2012;25(5):493‐520. - PubMed
Jiang 2005 {published data only}
    1. Jiang P, Luo T, Mo CJ, Gan XQ, Wang HJ. Intelligentized strabismus and amblyopia therapeutic apparatus for 216 cases of children's amblyopia. International Journal of Ophthalmology 2005;5(2):395‐7.
Kämpf 2001 {published data only}
    1. Kämpf U, Muchamedjarow F, Seiler T. Amblyopia treatment by means of computer games with background stimulation: a placebo controlled pilot study of 10 days [Unterstützende Amblyopiebehandlung durch Computerspiele mit Hintergrundstimulation: Eine 10‐tägige plazebokontrollierte Pilot‐Studie]. Klinische Monatsblätter für Augenheilkunde 2001;218(4):243‐50. - PubMed
Kämpf 2008 {published data only}
    1. Kämpf U, Shamshinova A, Kaschtschenko T, Mascolus W, Pillunat L, Haase W. Long‐term application of computer‐based pleoptics in home therapy: selected results of a prospective multicenter study. Strabismus 2008;16(4):149‐58. - PubMed
Kasten 1995 {published data only}
    1. Kasten E, Sabel BA. Visual field enlargement after computer training in brain‐damaged patients with homonymous deficits: an open pilot trial. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience 1995;8(3):113‐27. - PubMed
Kasten 2000 {published data only}
    1. Kasten E, Poggel DA, Sabel BA. Computer‐based training of stimulus detection improves color and simple pattern recognition in the defective field of hemianopic subjects. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2000;12(6):1001‐12. - PubMed
Kasten 2001 {published data only}
    1. Kasten E, Müller‐Oehring E, Sabel BA. Stability of visual field enlargements following computer‐based restitution training—results of a follow‐up. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 2001;23(3):297‐305. - PubMed
Kerkhoff 1998 {published data only}
    1. Kerkhoff G. Rehabilitation of visuospatial cognition and visual exploration in neglect: a cross‐over study. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience 1998;12(1):27‐40. - PubMed
Komm 2009 {published data only}
    1. Komm DU, Kasten E, Sabel BA, Gall C. Rehabilitation outcome in chronic neglect patients with associated visual field loss: results of a blinded, randomized crossover study. European Journal of Neurology 2009;16(S3):456.
Larizza 2014 {published data only}
    1. Larizza MF, Zukerman I, Bohnert F, Busija L, Bentley SA, Russell RA, et al. In‐home monitoring of older adults with vision impairment: exploring patients', caregivers' and professionals' views. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2014;21(1):56‐63. - PMC - PubMed
Lynch 2016 {published data only}
    1. Lynch MG, Maa AY. The use of telemedicine to extend ophthalmology care. JAMA Ophthalmology 2016;134(5):543‐4. - PubMed
Mines 2011 {published data only}
    1. Mines MJ, Bower KS, Lappan CM, Mazzoli RA, Poropatich RK. The United States Army ocular teleconsultation program 2004 through 2009. American Journal of Ophthalmology 2011;152(1):126‐32. - PubMed
NCT01083147 {published data only}
    1. NCT01083147. Age‐related macular degeneration (AMD)—beta study telemedicine assessment (AMD). clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01083147 (first received 9 March 2010).
NCT01581606 {published data only}
    1. NCT01581606. Evaluation of teleophthalmology in AMD—telemedicine solutions to improve patient access and quality of vision outcomes. clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01581606 (first received 20 April 2012).
NCT03560765 {published data only}
    1. NCT03560765. Mobile electronic devices for visual impairment (MED4VI) [Training in the use of smartphones and tablets to improve quality of life in visual impairment—mobile electronic devices for visual impairment]. clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/nct03560765 (first received 18 June 2018).
Patty 2018 {published data only}
    1. Patty NJS, Koopmanschap M, Holtzer‐Goor K. A cost‐effectiveness study of ICT training among the visually impaired in the Netherlands. BMC Ophthalmology 2018;18(1):98. - PMC - PubMed
Powers 2009 {published data only}
    1. Powers MK, Grisham JD, Wurm JK, Wurm WC. Improving visual skills: II‐remote assessment via Internet. Optometry 2009;82(2):61‐9. - PubMed
Puig de la Bellacasa 1980 {published data only}
    1. Puig de la Bellacasa R. Telecommunications, computers and other complementary communication means on behalf of the disabled. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research 1980;3(2):191‐204. - PubMed
Ross 1992 {published data only}
    1. Ross FL. The use of computers in occupational therapy for visual‐scanning training. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 1992;46(4):314‐22. - PubMed
Schenk 2013 {published data only}
    1. Schenk T, Aimola L, Lane AR, Smith DT, Kerkhoff G, Ford G. Efficacy and feasibility of a home‐based computer training for individuals with homonymous visual field defects. Behavioural Neurology 2013;27(3):316. - PubMed
Schiefer 2006 {published data only}
    1. Schiefer U, Nowomiejska K, Krapp E, Pätzold J, Johnson CA. K‐Train—a computer‐based, interactive training program with an incorporated certification system for practicing kinetic perimetry: evaluation of acceptance and success rate. Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 2006;244(10):1300‐9. - PubMed
Schinzel 2011 {published data only}
    1. Schinzel J, Dietze H, Muhlberg T, Paul F, Dorr J. Efficacy of vision restoration therapy after optic neuritis. Multiple Sclerosis 2011;17(10 Suppl):S476.
Silvestri 2017 {published data only}
    1. Silvestri V, Sulfaro M, Piscopo P, Guidobaldi M, Amore FM. Design and in‐office evaluation of a customizable low vision tele‐rehabilitation program. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2017; Vol. 58, issue 8. [iovs.arvojournals.org/article.aspx?articleid=2640635]
Srinivasan 2012 {published data only}
    1. Srinivasan K, Ramesh SV, Babu N, Sanker N, Ray A, Karuna SM. Efficacy of a remote based computerised visual acuity measurement. British Journal of Ophthalmology 2012;96(7):987‐90. - PubMed
Tan 2013 {published data only}
    1. Tan JC, Poh EW, Srinivasan S, Lim TH. A pilot trial of tele‐ophthalmology for diagnosis of chronic blurred vision. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 2013;19(2):65‐9. - PubMed
Tatarinov 1993 {published data only}
    1. Tatarinov SA, Amel'ianova SG, Kashchenko TP, Lakomkin VI, Avuchenkova TN, Galich VI. The importance of using the computer in treating children with strabismus and amblyopia [Znachenie ispol'zovaniia komp'iutera pri lechenii deteǐ s kosoglaziem i ambliopieǐ]. Vestnik Oftalmologii 1993;109(5):28‐9. - PubMed
Tennant 2001 {published data only}
    1. Tennant MT, Greve MD, Rudnisky CJ, Hillson TR, Hinz BJ. Identification of diabetic retinopathy by stereoscopic digital imaging via teleophthalmology: a comparison to slide film. Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology 2001;36(4):187‐96. - PubMed
Tsitsiashvili 2007 {published data only}
    1. Tsitsiashvili E. Application of special computer programs for diagnostics and treatment of amblyopia. Georgian Medical News 2007; Vol. 9, issue 150:7‐10. - PubMed
Ulrich 2009 {published data only}
    1. Ulrich JN, Poudyal G, Marks SJ, Vrabec TR, Marks B, Thapa AB, et al. Ocular telemedicine between Nepal and the USA: prevalence of vitreoretinal disease in rural Nepal. British Journal of Ophthalmology 2009;93(5):698‐9. - PubMed
Widdig 2006 {published data only}
    1. Widdig W, Wagner D, Pleger B, Schmitz J, Malin JP, Tegenthoff M. Therapy options for cortical visual disorders: with particular consideration of tele‐rehabilitation in cortical blindness [Therapiemöglichkeiten kortikaler sehstörungen: Unter besonderer berücksichtigung der tele‐rehabilitation bei kortikaler blindheit]. Ergotherapie und Rehabilitation 2006;45(10):10‐4.
Zhang 2013 {published data only}
    1. Zhang W, Yang X, Liao M, Zhang N, Liu L. Internet‐based perceptual learning in treating amblyopia. European Journal of Ophthalmology 2013;23(4):539‐45. - PubMed

References to ongoing studies

NCT03957980 {published data only}
    1. NCT03957980. Remote access: cortical visual impairment [Remote access to care for children with cortical visual impairment and their families]. clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03957980 (first received 21 May 2019).
van der Aa 2017 {published data only}
    1. NTR6082. E‐mental health treatment for patients with eye diseases (E‐PsEYE): pilot study [E‐mental health intervention for patients with retinal exudative diseases (E‐PsEYE) who receive intra‐ocular anti‐VEGF injections: pilot study]. www.trialregister.nl/trial/5894 (first received 6 September 2016).
    1. NTR6337. E‐mental health treatment for patients with eye diseases (E‐PsEYE): RCT [Economic evaluation of an e‐mental health intervention for patients with retinal exudative diseases (E‐PsEYE) who receive intra‐ocular anti‐VEGF injections: RCT]. apps.who.int/trialsearch/Trial2.aspx?TrialID=NTR6337 (first received 13 April 2017).
    1. Aa HPA, Rens GHMB, Verbraak FD, Bosscha M, Koopmanschap MA, Comijs HC, et al. Economic evaluation of an e‐mental health intervention for patients with retinal exudative diseases who receive intraocular anti‐VEGF injections (E‐PsEYE): protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2017;7(11):e018149. - PMC - PubMed

Additional references

Binns 2012
    1. Binns AM, Bunce C, Dickinson C, Harper R, Tudor‐Edwards R, Woodhouse M, et al. How effective is low vision service provision? A systematic review. Survey of Ophthalmology 2012;57(1):34‐65. - PubMed
Brennan 2011
    1. Brennan DM, Tindall L, Theodoros D, Brown J, Campbell M, Christiana D, et al. A blueprint for telerehabilitation guidelines—October 2010. Telemedicine and e‐Health 2011;17(8):662‐5. - PubMed
Chan 2018
    1. Chan T, Friedman DS, Bradley C, Massof R. Estimates of incidence and prevalence of visual impairment, low vision, and blindness in the United States. JAMA Ophthalmology 2018;136(1):12‐9. - PMC - PubMed
Covidence [Computer program]
    1. Veritas Health Innovation. Covidence. Melbourne, Australia: Veritas Health Innovation, accessed 6 July 2019.
Crossland 2014
    1. Crossland MD, Silva RS, Macedo AF. Smartphone, tablet computer and e‐reader use by people with vision impairment. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics 2014;34(5):552‐7. - PubMed
Foster 2008
    1. Foster A, Gilbert C, Johnson G. Changing patterns in global blindness: 1988‐2008. Community Eye Health Journal 2008;21(67):37. - PMC - PubMed
Goldstein 2012
    1. Goldstein JE, Massof RW, Deremeik JT, Braudway S, Jackson ML, Kehler KB, et al. Baseline traits of low vision patients served by private outpatient clinical centers in the United States. Archives of Ophthalmology 2012;130(8):1028‐37. - PMC - PubMed
GRADEpro GDT [Computer program]
    1. McMaster University (developed by Evidence Prime). GRADEpro GDT. Hamilton (ON): McMaster University (developed by Evidence Prime), accessed on 23 January 2020.
Higgins 2011
    1. Higgins JPT, Green S, editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from handbook.cochrane.org.
Higgins 2019
    1. Higgins JPT, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Sterne JAC. Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in a randomized trial. In: Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA, editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.0 (updated July 2019). Cochrane, 2019. Available from www.training.cochrane.org/handbook.
Lamoureux 2008
    1. Lamoureux EL, Chong E, Wang JJ, Saw SM, Aung T, Mitchell P, et al. Visual impairment, causes of vision loss, and falls: the Singapore Malay Eye Study. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 2008;49(2):528‐33. - PubMed
Madden 2002
    1. Madden AC, Simmons D, McCarty CA, Khan MA, Taylor HR. Eye health in rural Australia. Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 2002;30(5):316‐21. - PubMed
Markowitz 2006
    1. Markowitz SN. Principles of modern low vision rehabilitation. Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology 2006;41(3):289‐312. - PubMed
Murthy 2012
    1. Murthy KR, Murthy PR, Kapur A, Owens DR. Mobile diabetes eye care: experience in developing countries. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice 2012;97(3):343‐9. - PubMed
NEI glossary
    1. National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health. Low vision glossary. www.nei.nih.gov/lowvision/content/glossary.asp (accessed 13 August 2013).
Prathiba 2011
    1. Prathiba V, Rema M. Teleophthalmology: a model for eye care delivery in rural and underserved areas of India. International Journal of Family Medicine 2011;2011:Article ID 683267. - PMC - PubMed
Reeves 2019
    1. Reeves BC, Deeks JJ, Higgins JPT, Shea B, Tugwell P, Wells GA. Chapter 24: Including non‐randomized studies on intervention effects. In: Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA, editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.0 (updated July 2019). Cochrane, 2019. Available from www.training.cochrane.org/handbook.
Review Manager 2014 [Computer program]
    1. Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager 5 (RevMan 5). Version 5.3. Copenhagen: Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014.
Rogante 2010
    1. Rogante M, Grigioni M, Cordella D, Giacomozzi C. Ten years of telerehabilitation: a literature overview of technologies and clinical applications. NeuroRehabilitation 2010;27(4):287‐304. - PubMed
Stelmack 2008
    1. Stelmack JA, Tang XC, Reda DJ, Rinne S, Mancil RM, Massof RW, et al. Outcomes of the Veterans Affairs Low Vision Intervention Trial (LOVIT). Archives of Ophthalmology 2008;126(5):608‐17. - PubMed
Tang 2005
    1. Tang RA, Morales M, Ricur G, Schiffman JS. Telemedicine for eye care. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 2005;11(8):391‐6. - PubMed
Turner 2012
    1. Turner RM, Davey J, Clarke MJ, Thompson SG, Higgins JP. Predicting the extent of heterogeneity in meta‐analysis, using empirical data from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. International Journal of Epidemiology 2012;41(3):818‐27. - PMC - PubMed
Van den Berg 2012
    1. Berg N, Schumann M, Kraft K, Hoffmann W. Telemedicine and telecare for older patients—a systematic review. Maturitas 2012;73(2):94‐114. - PubMed
Watson 1997
    1. Watson GR, L'Aune W, Stelmack J, Maino J, Long S. National survey of the impact of low vision device use among veterans. Optometry and Vision Science 1997;74(5):249‐59. - PubMed
WHO low vision definition
    1. World Health Organization. Priorities and objectives—What do we want to achieve? Chapter 3.5.4 Low vision. www.who.int/ncd/vision2020_actionplan/contents/3.5.4.htm (accessed 13 August 2013).

References to other published versions of this review

Bittner 2014
    1. Bittner AK, Wykstra SL, Yoshinaga PD, Li T. Telerehabilitation for people with low vision. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2014, Issue 3. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011019] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Bittner 2015
    1. Bittner AK, Wykstra SL, Yoshinaga PD, Li T. Telerehabilitation for people with low vision. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015, Issue 8. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011019.pub2] - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types