Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jan 15;15(1):19-30.
doi: 10.5009/gnl19265.

Expanding Indications for Liver Transplant: Tumor and Patient Factors

Affiliations
Review

Expanding Indications for Liver Transplant: Tumor and Patient Factors

Kevin Ka-Wan Chu et al. Gut Liver. .

Abstract

During the past few decades, liver transplant has developed from a high-mortality procedure to an almost routine procedure with good survival outcomes. The development of living donor liver transplant has increased the availability of liver grafts, and the scope of indications for liver transplant has been expanding ever since. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of such an expansion of scope. Various criteria have been proposed to expand the eligibility of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma exceeding the Milan criteria for liver transplant. Furthermore, liver transplant is increasingly performed as a treatment modality for cholangiocarcinoma, neuroendocrine liver metastasis and colorectal liver metastasis. The number of elderly patients receiving liver transplant is on the rise. Combined organ transplantation has also been adopted to treat patients with multiple organ failure. Going forward, further development of preoperative noninvasive predictors in tumor, patient and even donor factors is needed to identify patients at risk of poor outcomes and hence optimize patient management.

Keywords: Hepatocellular carcinoma; Liver transplant; Surgical indication.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

References

    1. Chu KK, Chan SC, Sharr WW, Chok KS, Dai WC, Lo CM. Low-volume deceased donor liver transplantation alongside a strong living donor liver transplantation service. World J Surg. 2014;38:1522–1528. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2437-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jones PD, Hayashi PH, Barritt AS., 4th Liver transplantation in 2013: challenges and controversies. Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol. 2013;59:117–131. - PubMed
    1. Hashikura Y, Makuuchi M, Kawasaki S, et al. Successful living-related partial liver transplantation to an adult patient. Lancet. 1994;343:1233–1234. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(94)92450-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lo CM, Fan ST, Liu CL, et al. Extending the limit on the size of adult recipient in living donor liver transplantation using extended right lobe graft. Transplantation. 1997;63:1524–1528. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199705270-00027. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Strong RW, Lynch SV, Ong TH, Matsunami H, Koido Y, Balderson GA. Successful liver transplantation from a living donor to her son. N Engl J Med. 1990;322:1505–1507. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199005243222106. - DOI - PubMed