Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb 24;20(4):1235.
doi: 10.3390/s20041235.

A Comprehensive Machine-Learning-Based Software Pipeline to Classify EEG Signals: A Case Study on PNES vs. Control Subjects

Affiliations

A Comprehensive Machine-Learning-Based Software Pipeline to Classify EEG Signals: A Case Study on PNES vs. Control Subjects

Giuseppe Varone et al. Sensors (Basel). .

Abstract

The diagnosis of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) by means of electroencephalography (EEG) is not a trivial task during clinical practice for neurologists. No clear PNES electrophysiological biomarker has yet been found, and the only tool available for diagnosis is video EEG monitoring with recording of a typical episode and clinical history of the subject. In this paper, a data-driven machine learning (ML) pipeline for classifying EEG segments (i.e., epochs) of PNES and healthy controls (CNT) is introduced. This software pipeline consists of a semiautomatic signal processing technique and a supervised ML classifier to aid clinical discriminative diagnosis of PNES by means of an EEG time series. In our ML pipeline, statistical features like the mean, standard deviation, kurtosis, and skewness are extracted in a power spectral density (PSD) map split up in five conventional EEG rhythms (delta, theta, alpha, beta, and the whole band, i.e., 1-32 Hz). Then, the feature vector is fed into three different supervised ML algorithms, namely, the support vector machine (SVM), linear discriminant analysis (LDA), and Bayesian network (BN), to perform EEG segment classification tasks for CNT vs. PNES. The performance of the pipeline algorithm was evaluated on a dataset of 20 EEG signals (10 PNES and 10 CNT) that was recorded in eyes-closed resting condition at the Regional Epilepsy Centre, Great Metropolitan Hospital of Reggio Calabria, University of Catanzaro, Italy. The experimental results showed that PNES vs. CNT discrimination tasks performed via the ML algorithm and validated with random split (RS) achieved an average accuracy of 0.97 ± 0.013 (RS-SVM), 0.99 ± 0.02 (RS-LDA), and 0.82 ± 0.109 (RS-BN). Meanwhile, with leave-one-out (LOO) validation, an average accuracy of 0.98 ± 0.0233 (LOO-SVM), 0.98 ± 0.124 (LOO-LDA), and 0.81 ± 0.109 (LOO-BN) was achieved. Our findings showed that BN was outperformed by SVM and LDA. The promising results of the proposed software pipeline suggest that it may be a valuable tool to support existing clinical diagnosis.

Keywords: EEG; machine learning; psychogenic nonepileptic seizures.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All the authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Software pipeline.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) of three classifiers, namely, support vector machine (SVM), Bayesian network (BN), and linear discriminant analysis (LDA), (simulated data) with different area under the curve (AUC) values: (A,D) SVM, (B,E) NB, and (C,F) LDA. The classifiers were evaluated through two different methods: (AC) random split and (DF) leave-one-out (LOO).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bodde N.M.G., Brooks J.L., Baker G.A., Boon P.A.J.M., Hendriksen J.G.M., Mulder O.G., Aldenkamp A.P. Psychogenic non-epileptic seizures: Definition, etiology, treatment and prognostic issues: A critical review. Seizure. 2009;8:543–553. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2009.06.006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cianci V., Ferlazzo E., Condino F., Mauvais H.S., Farnarier G., Labate A., Latella M.A., Gasparini S., Branca D., Pucci F., et al. Rating scale for psychogenic nonepileptic seizures: Scale development and clinimetric testing. Epilepsy Behav. 2011;21:128–131. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2011.03.025. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baslet G., Roiko A., Prensky E. Heterogeneity in psychogenic nonepileptic seizures: Understanding the role of psychiatric and neurological factors. Epilepsy Behav. 2010;17:236–241. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2009.12.008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Uliaszek A.A., Prensky E., Baslet G. Emotion regulation profiles in psychogenic non-epileptic seizures. Epilepsy Behav. 2012;23:364–369. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2012.01.009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Leis A.A., Ross M.A., Summers A.K. Psychogenic seizures: Ictal characteristics and diagnostic pitfalls. Neurology. 1992;42:95–99. doi: 10.1212/WNL.42.1.95. - DOI - PubMed