Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb 27;51(8):1-10.
doi: 10.1017/S0033291720000100. Online ahead of print.

Measurement and genetic architecture of lifetime depression in the Netherlands as assessed by LIDAS (Lifetime Depression Assessment Self-report)

Affiliations

Measurement and genetic architecture of lifetime depression in the Netherlands as assessed by LIDAS (Lifetime Depression Assessment Self-report)

Iryna O Fedko et al. Psychol Med. .

Abstract

Background: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a common mood disorder, with a heritability of around 34%. Molecular genetic studies made significant progress and identified genetic markers associated with the risk of MDD; however, progress is slowed down by substantial heterogeneity as MDD is assessed differently across international cohorts. Here, we used a standardized online approach to measure MDD in multiple cohorts in the Netherlands and evaluated whether this approach can be used in epidemiological and genetic association studies of depression.

Methods: Within the Biobank Netherlands Internet Collaboration (BIONIC) project, we collected MDD data in eight cohorts involving 31 936 participants, using the online Lifetime Depression Assessment Self-report (LIDAS), and estimated the prevalence of current and lifetime MDD in 22 623 unrelated individuals. In a large Netherlands Twin Register (NTR) twin-family dataset (n ≈ 18 000), we estimated the heritability of MDD, and the prediction of MDD in a subset (n = 4782) through Polygenic Risk Score (PRS).

Results: Estimates of current and lifetime MDD prevalence were 6.7% and 18.1%, respectively, in line with population estimates based on validated psychiatric interviews. In the NTR heritability estimates were 0.34/0.30 (s.e. = 0.02/0.02) for current/lifetime MDD, respectively, showing that the LIDAS gives similar heritability rates for MDD as reported in the literature. The PRS predicted risk of MDD (OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.15-1.32, R2 = 1.47%).

Conclusions: By assessing MDD status in the Netherlands using the LIDAS instrument, we were able to confirm previously reported MDD prevalence and heritability estimates, which suggests that this instrument can be used in epidemiological and genetic association studies of depression.

Keywords: LIDAS; Lifetime Depression Assessment Self-report; major depressive disorder; online assessment tool; prevalence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Brenda W.J.H. Penninx: received research funding (not related to the BIONIC project) from Janssen Research and Boehringer Ingelheim.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Pooled estimates of (a) current MDD and (b) lifetime MDD prevalence as measured with LIDAS.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Pooled estimates of current (a) and (b) lifetime MDD prevalence as measured with LIDAS per subgroup (sex, age, education, smoking, physical activity, and obesity). Q, Cochran's Q; df, degrees of freedom; p, p value from the subgroup analysis of (a) current and (b) lifetime MDD; y.o., years old; t.p.w., times per week.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Proportion of lifetime MDD cases in NTR plotted against deciles of PRS profiles distribution. For each group of individuals falling into ith decile of PRS distribution, the proportion of cases was calculated. This plot shows the relationship between the increasing value of PRS profile and the increased number of MDD cases. The line plotted through the points is a linear regression line with shaded area around it depicting the 95% confidence interval.

References

    1. Abdellaoui, A., Hottenga, J.-J., de Knijff, P., Nivard, M. G., Xiao, X., Scheet, P., … Boomsma, D. I. (2013). Population structure, migration, and diversifying selection in the Netherlands. European Journal of Human Genetics, 21(11), 1277–1285. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Achenbach, T., & Rescorla, L. (2003). Manual for the ASEBA adult forms & profiles. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth & Families.
    1. Andrade, L., Caraveo-Anduaga, J., Berglund, P., Bijl, R., Kessler, R., Demler, O., … Wittchen, H. (2000). Cross-national comparisons of the prevalences and correlates of mental disorders. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 78(4), 413–426. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bijl, R. V., Ravelli, A., & Van Zessen, G. (1998). Prevalence of psychiatric disorder in the general population: Results of The Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study (NEMESIS). Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 33(12), 587–595. - PubMed
    1. Boomsma, D. I., Helmer, Q., Nieuwboer, H. A., Hottenga, J. J., de Moor, M. H., van Den Berg, S. M., … de Geus, E. J. (2018). An extended twin-pedigree study of neuroticism in the Netherlands Twin Register. Behavior Genetics, 48(1), 1–11. - PMC - PubMed