Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Feb 26;33(2):e00151-19.
doi: 10.1128/CMR.00151-19. Print 2020 Mar 18.

Mumps: an Update on Outbreaks, Vaccine Efficacy, and Genomic Diversity

Affiliations
Review

Mumps: an Update on Outbreaks, Vaccine Efficacy, and Genomic Diversity

Eugene Lam et al. Clin Microbiol Rev. .

Abstract

Mumps is an acute viral infection characterized by inflammation of the parotid and other salivary glands. Persons with mumps are infectious from 2 days before through 5 days after parotitis onset, and transmission is through respiratory droplets. Despite the success of mumps vaccination programs in the United States and parts of Europe, a recent increase in outbreaks of mumps virus infections among fully vaccinated populations has been reported. Although the effectiveness of the mumps virus component of the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine is suboptimal, a range of contributing factors has led to these outbreaks occurring in high-vaccination-coverage settings, including the intensity of exposure, the possibility of vaccine strain mismatch, delayed implementation of control measures due to the timeliness of reporting, a lack of use of appropriate laboratory tests (such as reverse transcription-PCR), and time since last vaccination. The resurgence of mumps virus infections among previously vaccinated individuals over the past decade has prompted discussions about new strategies to mitigate the risk of future outbreaks. The decision to implement a third dose of the MMR vaccine in response to an outbreak should be considered in discussions with local public health agencies. Traditional public health measures, including the isolation of infectious persons, timely contact tracing, and effective communication and awareness education for the public and medical community, should remain key interventions for outbreak control. Maintaining high mumps vaccination coverage remains key to U.S. and global efforts to reduce disease incidence and rates of complications.

Keywords: genomic diversity; mumps; outbreaks; vaccine effectiveness; vaccine efficacy.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. McLean HQ, Fiebelkorn AP, Temte JL, Wallace GS, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . 2013. Prevention of measles, rubella, congenital rubella syndrome, and mumps, 2013: summary recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR Recomm Rep 62(RR-04):1–34. - PubMed
    1. Henle G, Henle W, Wendell KK, Rosenberg P. 1948. Isolation of mumps virus from human beings with induced apparent or inapparent infections. J Exp Med 88:223–232. doi:10.1084/jem.88.2.223. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Philip RN, Reinhard KR, Lackman DB. 1959. Observations on a mumps epidemic in a virgin population. Am J Hyg 69:91–111. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a119992. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brunell PA, Brickman A, O'Hare D, Steinberg S. 1968. Ineffectiveness of isolation of patients as a method of preventing the spread of mumps. Failure of the mumps skin-test antigen to predict immune status. N Engl J Med 279:1357–1361. doi:10.1056/NEJM196812192792502. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dayan GH, Quinlisk MP, Parker AA, Barskey AE, Harris ML, Schwartz JMH, Hunt K, Finley CG, Leschinsky DP, O'Keefe AL, Clayton J, Kightlinger LK, Dietle EG, Berg J, Kenyon CL, Goldstein ST, Stokley SK, Redd SB, Rota PA, Rota J, Bi D, Roush SW, Bridges CB, Santibanez TA, Parashar U, Bellini WJ, Seward JF. 2008. Recent resurgence of mumps in the United States. N Engl J Med 358:1580–1589. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0706589. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances