Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Mar;5(1):10.3390/languages5010002.
doi: 10.3390/languages5010002. Epub 2019 Dec 27.

Language Difficulty and Prior Learning Influence Foreign Vocabulary Acquisition

Affiliations

Language Difficulty and Prior Learning Influence Foreign Vocabulary Acquisition

Sayuri Hayakawa et al. Languages (Basel). 2020 Mar.

Abstract

When learning a foreign language, words that are the hardest to learn are often the easiest to forget. Yet, there is also evidence that more challenging learning contexts can lead to greater long-term retention. Here, we investigate the effect of language difficulty on vocabulary retention by teaching participants novel words that varied in both imageability and similarity to a known language over a period of four weeks. We found that easier words (high-imageability and familiar) were generally retained better than harder words (low-imageability and unfamiliar). However, when words were fully learned during training, the more difficult unfamiliar words were later recalled with higher accuracy than easier familiar words. The effect of language difficulty on vocabulary retention therefore varies depending on how well words were initially encoded. We conclude that greater challenges can reap greater long-term rewards so long as learners establish a strong foundation during initial acquisition.

Keywords: desirable difficulties; foreign language acquisition; imageability; language similarity; vocabulary.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Effects of familiarity and imageability on accuracy (%) in sessions 1, 2, and 3.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Surprise recall test accuracy (%) based on learning in the initial (first) and follow-up (second) training sessions collapsed across language familiarity and imageability.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Surprise recall test accuracy (%) based on learning in the initial (first) and follow-up (second) training sessions divided by language group, with the familiar language on the left and the unfamiliar language on the right.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Surprise recall test accuracy (%) based on learning in the initial (first) and follow-up (second) training sessions divided by word imageability, with the high-imageability words on the left and the low-imageability words on the right.

Similar articles

References

    1. Agarwal Pooja K., Finley Jason R., Rose Nathan S., and Roediger Henry L. 2017. Benefits from Retrieval Practice Are Greater for Students with Lower Working Memory Capacity. Memory 25: 764–71. - PubMed
    1. Altarriba Jeanette, Bauer Lisa M., and Benvenuto Claudia. 1999. Concreteness, Context Availability, and Imageability Ratings and Word Associations for Abstract, Concrete, and Emotion Words. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers 31: 578–602. - PubMed
    1. Atkinson Richard C. 1972. Optimizing the Learning of a Second-Language Vocabulary. Journal of Experimental Psychology 96: 124–29.
    1. Barcroft Joe. 2002. Semantic and Structural Elaboration in L2 Lexical Acquisition. Language Learning 52: 323–63.
    1. Barcroft Joe. 2004. Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition: A Lexical Input Processing Approach. Foreign Language Annals 37: 200–8.

LinkOut - more resources