Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb 13:2020:1796247.
doi: 10.1155/2020/1796247. eCollection 2020.

Reliability of the DIERS Formetric 4D Spine Shape Parameters in Adults without Postural Deformities

Affiliations

Reliability of the DIERS Formetric 4D Spine Shape Parameters in Adults without Postural Deformities

Brian F Degenhardt et al. Biomed Res Int. .

Abstract

The DIERS formetric 4D provides a safe method to monitor and track the progression of postural deformities over time. However, further evaluation of reliability is necessary. Reference values are also needed to indicate postural change. The current study examined the reliability of spine shape parameters produced by the formetric 4D in adults without postural abnormalities and established reference values to determine when real change occurs. Thirty participants were scanned during 1 week. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated for 40 spine shape parameters for scans with participants stationary between scans, scans with repositioning between scans, and between days. Within-day and between-day standard error of measurement (SEM), absolute relative SEM, and smallest detectable change (SDC) were reported. ICC for stationary scans was excellent for 29 parameters, good for 10 parameters, and fair for 1 parameter. With repositioning, ICC was excellent for 27 parameters, good for 12 parameters, and fair for 1 parameter. Between days, ICC was excellent for 26 parameters, good for 10 parameters, and fair for 4 parameters. Within-day SEM% was greater than 10% for 6 parameters. Within-day SDC ranged from 1.80 to 25.03 units for a single scan and from 0.97 to 17.93 units for 6 scans. Between-day SEM% was greater than 10% for 9 parameters. Between-day SDC ranged from 1.44 to 28.24 units for a single scan and from 1.05 to 22.2 units for 6 scans. Thirty-six of the 40 spine shape parameters from the DIERS formetric 4D reliably distinguished between participants over time. Reference values were established that can be used to track patient postural change over time. Future research should investigate the clinical relevance of these 40 spine shape parameters and determine when a clinically important change in posture occurs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Example of formetric 4D projection unit set-up with participant positioning. Image used with permission from DIERS Medical Systems.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Formetric 4D recording (a), digitizing and 3D modeling (b), calculating curvature (c), and measurement procedure (d). Images used with permission from DIERS Medical Systems.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Smallest detectable change (SDC) for kyphotic angle ICT-ITL. Abbreviations: ICT: cervicothoracic transition point; ITL: thoracolumbar transition point.

References

    1. Frerich J. M., Hertzler K., Knott P., Mardjetko S. Comparison of radiographic and surface topography measurements in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. Open Orthopaedics Journal. 2012;6:261–265. doi: 10.2174/1874325001206010261. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Knott P., Sturm P., Lonner B., et al. Multicenter comparison of 3D spinal measurements using surface topography with those from conventional radiography. Spine Deformity. 2016;4(2):98–103. doi: 10.1016/j.jspd.2015.08.008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Abdel Raoof N. A. B., Kadrya H., Elsayed Salah Eldin B., Soliman E. S. The correlation between radiographic and surface topography assessments in three plane pelvic parameters. Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation. 2017;30:175–181. doi: 10.3233/bmr-150444. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Navarro I. J. R. L., Bruna Nichele da R., Candotti C. T. Anatomical reference marks, evlauation parameters and reproducibility of surface topography for evaluating the adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a systemic review with meta-analysis. Gait and Posture. 2019;69:112–120. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.01.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mangone M. R., Paolo P., Paoloni M., et al. Vertebral rotation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis calculated by radiograph and the back surface analysis-based methods: correlation between the Raimondi method and rasterstereography. European Spine Journal. 2013;22:367–371. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2564-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed