A cohort-based comprehensive characterization of different patterns of very short-term, within-visit, blood pressure variability
- PMID: 32106147
- DOI: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000435
A cohort-based comprehensive characterization of different patterns of very short-term, within-visit, blood pressure variability
Abstract
Aim: To characterize different patterns of variability of three repeated within-visit blood pressure (BP) readings and to determine the prevalence of specific variation trends in systolic (SBP), diastolic (DBP) blood pressure and pulse pressure (PP).
Methods: Data from 53 737 subjects from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey were analyzed. In each subject, three consecutive BP measurements were performed with a minimum time-interval of at least 30 s. We propose three patterns of within-visit BP variability (separately for SBP, DBP and PP): (1) increasing trend (BP3 > BP2 > BP1); (2) decreasing trend (BP1 > BP2 > BP3) and (3) no trend (BP3 ≈ BP2 ≈ BP1). A threshold of minimum change (ΔP > 3 mmHg) between BP1-BP2 and BP2-BP3 was also applied as a prerequisite for the definition of these trends.
Results: An increasing trend was observed among three consecutive measurements of SBP, DBP and PP in 7.4, 10.4 and 10.2%, respectively. When a minimum threshold of 3 mmHg was set the respective increasing trends were observed in 1.8, 2.9 and 4.4%, respectively. There was a higher prevalence of decreasing trend within three consecutive SBP, DBP and PP readings: 17, 13.1 and 16.2%, respectively, whereas using a threshold of ΔP >3 mmHg the respective prevalence was 6.3, 4.1 and 7.7%. A maximum absolute difference >10 mmHg within triplicate of SBP/DBP/PP readings was observed in 12.9, 13 and 29.4%, respectively. In the era of personalized medicine, these patterns are well worth further investigation concerning their pathophysiologic and clinical relevance.
Comment in
-
Complexities of short-term blood pressure variability interpretation.Blood Press Monit. 2020 Oct;25(5):299. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000449. Blood Press Monit. 2020. PMID: 32889889 No abstract available.
-
Very-short-term blood pressure variability: complexities and challenges.Blood Press Monit. 2020 Oct;25(5):300. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000464. Blood Press Monit. 2020. PMID: 32889890 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
No further decrease in blood pressure when the interval between readings exceeds one hour.Blood Press Monit. 2008 Apr;13(2):85-9. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e3282f3fb1b. Blood Press Monit. 2008. PMID: 18347442
-
Decrease in Serum HDL-C Level Is Associated with Elevation of Blood Pressure: Correlation Analysis from the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2017.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 9;17(3):1101. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17031101. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020. PMID: 32050502 Free PMC article.
-
Utility of blood pressure measurements at an initial screening visit to identify Chinese children and adolescents with hypertension.J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2021 Apr;23(4):766-772. doi: 10.1111/jch.14127. Epub 2021 Feb 3. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2021. PMID: 33533540 Free PMC article.
-
Visit-to-Visit Blood Pressure Variability and Mortality and Cardiovascular Outcomes Among Older Adults: The Health, Aging, and Body Composition Study.Am J Hypertens. 2017 Feb;30(2):151-158. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpw106. Epub 2016 Sep 6. Am J Hypertens. 2017. PMID: 27600581 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of blood pressure lowering on outcome incidence in hypertension: 2. Effects at different baseline and achieved blood pressure levels--overview and meta-analyses of randomized trials.J Hypertens. 2014 Dec;32(12):2296-304. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000000379. J Hypertens. 2014. PMID: 25259547 Review.
Cited by
-
Relation between Blood Pressure Variability within a Single Visit and Stroke.Int J Hypertens. 2021 Mar 2;2021:2920140. doi: 10.1155/2021/2920140. eCollection 2021. Int J Hypertens. 2021. PMID: 33747558 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Stevens SL, Wood S, Koshiaris C, Law K, Glasziou P, Stevens RJ, McManus RJ.. Blood pressure variability and cardiovascular disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2016; 354:i4098
-
- Wang J, Shi X, Ma C, Zheng H, Xiao J, Bian H, et al. Visit-to-visit blood pressure variability is a risk factor for all-cause mortality and cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hypertens. 2017; 35:10–17
-
- Schulze MB, Kroke A, Bergmann MM, Boeing H.. Differences of blood pressure estimates between consecutive measurements on one occasion: implications for inter-study comparability of epidemiologic studies. Eur J Epidemiol. 2000; 16:891–898
-
- Slabý A, Josífko M.. Does sequential automated measurement improve the estimate of resting blood pressure? J Hum Hypertens. 1992; 6:31–34
-
- Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W, Agabiti Rosei E, Azizi M, Burnier M, et al.; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2018 ESC/ESH guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. Eur Heart J. 2018; 39:3021–3104
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous