Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jun;25(3):131-135.
doi: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000435.

A cohort-based comprehensive characterization of different patterns of very short-term, within-visit, blood pressure variability

Affiliations

A cohort-based comprehensive characterization of different patterns of very short-term, within-visit, blood pressure variability

Theodore G Papaioannou et al. Blood Press Monit. 2020 Jun.

Abstract

Aim: To characterize different patterns of variability of three repeated within-visit blood pressure (BP) readings and to determine the prevalence of specific variation trends in systolic (SBP), diastolic (DBP) blood pressure and pulse pressure (PP).

Methods: Data from 53 737 subjects from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey were analyzed. In each subject, three consecutive BP measurements were performed with a minimum time-interval of at least 30 s. We propose three patterns of within-visit BP variability (separately for SBP, DBP and PP): (1) increasing trend (BP3 > BP2 > BP1); (2) decreasing trend (BP1 > BP2 > BP3) and (3) no trend (BP3 ≈ BP2 ≈ BP1). A threshold of minimum change (ΔP > 3 mmHg) between BP1-BP2 and BP2-BP3 was also applied as a prerequisite for the definition of these trends.

Results: An increasing trend was observed among three consecutive measurements of SBP, DBP and PP in 7.4, 10.4 and 10.2%, respectively. When a minimum threshold of 3 mmHg was set the respective increasing trends were observed in 1.8, 2.9 and 4.4%, respectively. There was a higher prevalence of decreasing trend within three consecutive SBP, DBP and PP readings: 17, 13.1 and 16.2%, respectively, whereas using a threshold of ΔP >3 mmHg the respective prevalence was 6.3, 4.1 and 7.7%. A maximum absolute difference >10 mmHg within triplicate of SBP/DBP/PP readings was observed in 12.9, 13 and 29.4%, respectively. In the era of personalized medicine, these patterns are well worth further investigation concerning their pathophysiologic and clinical relevance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Stevens SL, Wood S, Koshiaris C, Law K, Glasziou P, Stevens RJ, McManus RJ.. Blood pressure variability and cardiovascular disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2016; 354:i4098
    1. Wang J, Shi X, Ma C, Zheng H, Xiao J, Bian H, et al. Visit-to-visit blood pressure variability is a risk factor for all-cause mortality and cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hypertens. 2017; 35:10–17
    1. Schulze MB, Kroke A, Bergmann MM, Boeing H.. Differences of blood pressure estimates between consecutive measurements on one occasion: implications for inter-study comparability of epidemiologic studies. Eur J Epidemiol. 2000; 16:891–898
    1. Slabý A, Josífko M.. Does sequential automated measurement improve the estimate of resting blood pressure? J Hum Hypertens. 1992; 6:31–34
    1. Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W, Agabiti Rosei E, Azizi M, Burnier M, et al.; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2018 ESC/ESH guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. Eur Heart J. 2018; 39:3021–3104

LinkOut - more resources