Reduced incidence and economic cost of hardware removal after ankle fracture surgery: a 20-year nationwide registry study
- PMID: 32106732
- PMCID: PMC8023897
- DOI: 10.1080/17453674.2020.1733749
Reduced incidence and economic cost of hardware removal after ankle fracture surgery: a 20-year nationwide registry study
Abstract
Background and purpose - Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) is a treatment method for unstable ankle fractures. During recent years, scientific evidence has shed light on surgical indications as well as on hardware removal. We assessed the incidence and trends of hardware removal procedures following ORIF of ankle fractures.Patients and methods - The study covered all patients 18 years of age and older who had an ankle fracture treated with ORIF in Finland between the years 1997 and 2016. Patient data were obtained from the Finnish National Hospital Discharge Register.Results - 68,865 patients had an ankle fracture treated with ORIF in Finland during the 20-year study period between 1997 and 2016. A hardware removal procedure was performed on 27% of patients (n = 18,648). The incidence of hardware removal procedures after ankle fracture decreased from 31 (95% CI 29-32) per 100,000 person-years in the highest year 2001 (n = 1,247) to 13 (CI 12-14) per 100,000 person-years in 2016 (n = 593). Moreover, the proportion and number of removal operations performed within the first 3 months also decreased. The costs of removal procedures decreased from approximately €994,000 in 2001 to €472,600 in 2016.Interpretation - Removal of hardware after ankle surgery (ORIF) is a common operation with substantial costs. However, the incidence and cost of removals decreased during the study period, with a particular decrease in hardware removal operations within 3 months.
Figures
References
-
- Bostman O, Pihlajamaki H. Routine implant removal after fracture surgery: a potentially reducible consumer of hospital resources in trauma units. J Trauma 1996; 41(5): 846–9. - PubMed
-
- Bostman O M, Laitinen O M, Tynninen O, Salminen S T, Pihlajamaki H K. Tissue restoration after resorption of polyglycolide and poly-laevo-lactic acid screws. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005; 87(11): 1575–80. - PubMed
-
- Dingemans S A, Rammelt S, White T O, Goslings J C, Schepers T. Should syndesmotic screws be removed after surgical fixation of unstable ankle fractures? A systematic review. Bone Joint J 2016; 98-B(11): 1497–1504. - PubMed
-
- Egol K A, Pahk B, Walsh M, Tejwani N C, Davidovitch R I, Koval K J. Outcome after unstable ankle fracture: effect of syndesmotic stabilization. J Orthop Trauma 2010; 24(1): 7–11. - PubMed
-
- Fenelon C, Murphy E P, Galbraith J G, Kearns S R. The burden of hardware removal in ankle fractures: how common is it, why do we do it and what is the cost? A ten-year review. Foot Ankle Surg 2019; 25(4): 546–9. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical