Monitoring Outcome after Hospital-Presenting Milder Spectrum Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury Using the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended, Pediatric Revision
- PMID: 32106753
- PMCID: PMC7339019
- DOI: 10.1089/neu.2019.6893
Monitoring Outcome after Hospital-Presenting Milder Spectrum Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury Using the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended, Pediatric Revision
Abstract
The Glasgow Outcome Scale, Pediatric Revision (GOSE-P) is an assessment of "global outcome" designed as a developmentally appropriate version of the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended for use in clinical trials of children with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Initial testing describes validity across a wide age and injury severity spectrum, yet the GOSE-P's utility for monitoring children with milder injuries is less clear. We examined the level of agreement between the GOSE-P and the Health and Behavior Inventory (HBI), a TBI-related symptom checklist used to assess children with mild TBI for clinical and research purposes. Participants included children and adolescents 3-16 years of age (n = 50) who presented to two level 1 trauma centers within 24 h of injury, with a GCS of 13-15, who underwent clinical neuroimaging. Outcome was assessed 2 weeks and 3 months following injury. We examined the severity of TBI-related symptoms across disability categories identified using the GOSE-P, and the level of agreement between the two measures in identifying deficits 2 weeks following injury and improvement from 2 weeks to 3 months. Using the GOSE-P, 62% had deficits at 2 weeks, and 42% improved from 2 weeks to 3 months. Agreement between the GOSE-P and HBI was fair 2 weeks after TBI (k = 0.24-0.33), and poor for identifying subsequent improvement (k = 0.10-0.16). Modest agreement between the GOSE-P and the HBI may reflect restricted participation from diverse causes, including TBI, other bodily injuries, and prescribed activity restrictions, and highlights the need for multi-dimensional outcome batteries.
Keywords: brain concussion; brain injuries, traumatic; head injuries, closed; outcome assessment (healthcare); pediatrics.
Conflict of interest statement
Emily Evans received support from the Center on Health Services Training and Research (CoHSTAR). Grant Iverson has received research support from test publishing companies including Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc. and CNS Vital Signs in the past (not in the past 5 years). He acknowledges unrestricted philanthropic support from ImPACT Applications, Inc., the Mooney-Reed Charitable Foundation, the Heinz Family Foundation, and the Spaulding Research Institute. He receives royalties for one neuropsychological test (Wisconsin Card Sorting Test-64 Card Version). No other conflict of interests or competing financial interests exist.
References
-
- Jennett B., and Bond M. (1975). Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. Lancet 1, 480–484 - PubMed
-
- Wilson J.T., Pettigrew L.E., and Teasdale G.M. (1998). Structured interviews for the Glasgow Outcome Scale and the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale: guidelines for their use. J. Neurotrauma 15, 573–585 - PubMed
-
- Levin H.S., Boake C., Song J., Mccauley S., Contant C., Diaz-Marchan P., Brundage S., Goodman H., and Kotrla K.J. (2001). Validity and sensitivity to change of the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale in mild to moderate traumatic brain injury. J. Neurotrauma 18, 575–584 - PubMed
-
- Teasdale G.M., Pettigrew L.E., Wilson J.T., Murray G., and Jennett B. (1998). Analyzing outcome of treatment of severe head injury: a review and update on advancing the use of the Glasgow Outcome Scale. J. Neurotrauma 15, 587–597 - PubMed
-
- McMillan T., Wilson L., Ponsford J., Levin H., Teasdale G., and Bond M. (2016). The Glasgow Outcome Scale – 40 years of application and refinement. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 12, 477–485 - PubMed
