Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020;18(10):936-965.
doi: 10.2174/1570159X18666200227125854.

The Effects of General Anesthetics on Synaptic Transmission

Affiliations
Review

The Effects of General Anesthetics on Synaptic Transmission

Xuechao Hao et al. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2020.

Abstract

General anesthetics are a class of drugs that target the central nervous system and are widely used for various medical procedures. General anesthetics produce many behavioral changes required for clinical intervention, including amnesia, hypnosis, analgesia, and immobility; while they may also induce side effects like respiration and cardiovascular depressions. Understanding the mechanism of general anesthesia is essential for the development of selective general anesthetics which can preserve wanted pharmacological actions and exclude the side effects and underlying neural toxicities. However, the exact mechanism of how general anesthetics work is still elusive. Various molecular targets have been identified as specific targets for general anesthetics. Among these molecular targets, ion channels are the most principal category, including ligand-gated ionotropic receptors like γ-aminobutyric acid, glutamate and acetylcholine receptors, voltage-gated ion channels like voltage-gated sodium channel, calcium channel and potassium channels, and some second massager coupled channels. For neural functions of the central nervous system, synaptic transmission is the main procedure for which information is transmitted between neurons through brain regions, and intact synaptic function is fundamentally important for almost all the nervous functions, including consciousness, memory, and cognition. Therefore, it is important to understand the effects of general anesthetics on synaptic transmission via modulations of specific ion channels and relevant molecular targets, which can lead to the development of safer general anesthetics with selective actions. The present review will summarize the effects of various general anesthetics on synaptic transmissions and plasticity.

Keywords: Neuropharmacology; general anesthetics; ion channels; neurotransmitter; synaptic plasticity; synaptic transmission.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. (1)
Fig. (1)
Diverse structures of general anesthetics. A: Volatile anesthetics including halothane, isoflurane, sevoflurane and desflurane. The chemical name of halothane is 2-bromo-2-chloro-1,1,1-trifluoroethane, belongs to a different class of compounds than fluorinated ether for isoflurane, sevoflurane and desflurane. But they produce similar pharmacological actions including amnesia, hypnosis, unconsciousness and immobility. B: Commonly used tool drug for anesthetic research F6. F6 has similar physicochemical properties to volatile anesthetics, but F6 cannot produce general anesthetic actions including unconsciousness and immobility. These facts indicate that physicochemical property (e.g. lipid solubility) is not the determined mechanism for general anesthesia. C: Commonly used intravenous general anesthetics, including propofol, etomidate, ketamine and phenobarbital. The structures of these intravenous general anesthetics are varied while all induce unconsciousness. Nevertheless, the discrepancy in structure determined various mechanisms of general anesthesia by enhancing inhibitory neuron or inhibiting excitatory neuron, and even might be associated with other effect, such as sympathetic suppression or activation.
Fig. (2)
Fig. (2)
Physiological process of synaptic transmission and possible synaptic targets for general anesthetics. A: Main process of chemical synaptic transmission in physiological condition. Action potentials mediated by voltage-gated sodium channel propagate to terminal boutons and depolarize the presynaptic membrane. The depolarization results in calcium influx and exocytosis for neurotransmitter release by vesicles fusion with presynaptic membrane. The released neurotransmitter binds and activates postsynaptic receptors, further lead to excitatory or inhibitory postsynaptic potential. B: Underlying targets for general anesthetics on synaptic transmission. Theoretically, all the components participating the synaptic transmission are possible targets of general anesthetics. General anesthetics modulate synaptic actions by both pre- (release) and post-synaptic (receptor) mechanisms. At presynaptic part, voltage-gated sodium channel (Nav), voltage-gated calcium channel (Cav) and the soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive fusion protein attachment protein receptor (SNARE) are key targets of general anesthetics to inhibiting neurotransmitter release. At postsynaptic part, general anesthetics act mainly by enhancing inhibitory neuronal receptor, such as γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and glycine receptors, or suppressing excitatory neuronal receptors such as glutamate and acetylcholine receptors [25]. (A higher resolution / colour version of this figure is available in the electronic copy of the article).
Fig. (3)
Fig. (3)
Effects of isoflurane on GABA and glutamate release. A-B: Isoflurane inhibits calcium influx measured by fluorescence imaging of GCaMP3 (A). Calcium influx is inhibited by isoflurane in a concentration-dependent manner. The blue bar indicates the clinically relevant concentrations of isoflurane (0.175-0.7 mM) (B); C: Fluorescence imaging experiment demonstrated that isoflurane significantly depress exocytosis as measured by vGlut-pHlourin; D-E: The depression of isoflurane on exocytosis and Ca2+ influx is more potent for glutamate (Glut) than GABA [39]; F: The depression of isoflurane on 4AP-evoked release of glutamate and GABA are different in various part of central nervous system including cortex, hippocampus, striatum and spinal cord. The blue bar indicates the clinically relevant concentrations of isoflurane (0.175-0.7 mM) [62]. (A higher resolution / colour version of this figure is available in the electronic copy of the article).
Fig. (4)
Fig. (4)
Effects of isoflurane on voltage-gated sodium channels. A: Effects of isoflurane on voltage-gated sodium channel (Nav) gating. Nav typically exists in three states, resting, open and inactivated. Isoflurane can significantly stabilize inactivated state of sodium channels by facilitating voltage-dependent inactivation and delaying recovery from inactivation [79]; B: The effect of isoflurane on voltage-dependent activation of Nav is insignificant; C: Isoflurane significantly hyperpolarized voltage-dependent inactivation curve of Nav; D: Isoflurane significantly delay recovery of Nav from steady-state inactivation; E-F: Voltage- and use-dependent inhibition of isoflurane on sodium peak currents. The inhibition of isoflurane on sodium peak currents is more potent from the depolarized holding potential (V1/2inact) than physiologically relevant potential (-70 mV) [80]. (A higher resolution / colour version of this figure is available in the electronic copy of the article).
Fig. (5)
Fig. (5)
Structure of GABAA receptors and general anesthetics binding sites. A-B: Brief structures of GABAA receptor, which contains five subunits and four transmembrane domains for each subunit. Each subunit has a binding domain extracellularly and regulatory domain intracellularly. C: The released GABA from presynaptic membrane activates GABAA receptors, which then leading to chloride influx and hyperpolarization of postsynaptic membrane; D: The possible binding sites for benzodiazepines (upper), propofol and etomidate (lower) on GABAA receptor. Benzodiazepines binds GABAA receptors at extra-membrane site between α and γ subunits. However, propofol and etomidate can bind the α and β subunits at their transmembrane domains. (A higher resolution / colour version of this figure is available in the electronic copy of the article).

References

    1. Meara J.G., Leather A.J., Hagander L., Alkire B.C., Alonso N., Ameh E.A., Bickler S.W., Conteh L., Dare A.J., Davies J., Mérisier E.D., El-Halabi S., Farmer P.E., Gawande A., Gillies R., Greenberg S.L., Grimes C.E., Gruen R.L., Ismail E.A., Kamara T.B., Lavy C., Lundeg G., Mkandawire N.C., Raykar N.P., Riesel J.N., Rodas E., Rose J., Roy N., Shrime M.G., Sullivan R., Verguet S., Watters D., Weiser T.G., Wilson I.H., Yamey G., Yip W. Global Surgery 2030: evidence and solutions for achieving health, welfare, and economic development. Lancet. 2015;386(9993):569–624. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60160-X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Missner A., Pohl P. 110 years of the Meyer-Overton rule: predicting membrane permeability of gases and other small compounds. ChemPhysChem. 2009;10(9-10):1405–1414. doi: 10.1002/cphc.200900270. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Herold K.F., Sanford R.L., Lee W., Andersen O.S., Hemmings H.C., Jr Clinical concentrations of chemically diverse general anesthetics minimally affect lipid bilayer properties. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2017;114(12):3109–3114. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1611717114. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Herold K.F., Andersen O.S., Hemmings H.C., Jr Divergent effects of anesthetics on lipid bilayer properties and sodium channel function. Eur. Biophys. J. 2017;46(7):617–626. doi: 10.1007/s00249-017-1239-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hemmings H.C., Jr, Akabas M.H., Goldstein P.A., Trudell J.R., Orser B.A., Harrison N.L. Emerging molecular mechanisms of general anesthetic action. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2005;26(10):503–510. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2005.08.006. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources