Injury characteristics of the Pulse Nightclub shooting: Lessons for mass casualty incident preparation
- PMID: 32107352
- DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002574
Injury characteristics of the Pulse Nightclub shooting: Lessons for mass casualty incident preparation
Abstract
Background: On the morning of June 12, 2016, an armed assailant entered the Pulse Nightclub in Orlando, Florida, and initiated an assault that killed 49 people and injured 53. The regional Level I trauma center and two community hospitals responded to this mass casualty incident. A detailed analysis was performed to guide hospitals who strive to prepare for future similar events.
Methods: A retrospective review of all victim charts and/or autopsy reports was performed to identify victim presentation patterns, injuries sustained, and surgical resources required. Patients were stratified into three groups: survivors who received care at the regional Level I trauma center, survivors who received care at one of two local community hospitals, and decedents.
Results: Of the 102 victims, 40 died at the scene and 9 died upon arrival to the Level I trauma center. The remaining 53 victims received definitive medical care and survived. Twenty-nine victims were admitted to the trauma center and five victims to a community hospital. The remaining 19 victims were treated and discharged that day. Decedents sustained significantly more bullet impacts than survivors (4 ± 3 vs. 2 ± 1; p = 0.008) and body regions injured (3 ± 1 vs. 2 ± 1; p = 0.0002). Gunshots to the head, chest, and abdominal body regions were significantly more common among decedents than survivors (p < 0.0001). Eighty-two percent of admitted patients required surgery in the first 24 hours. Essential resources in the first 24 hours included trauma surgeons, emergency room physicians, orthopedic/hand surgeons, anesthesiologists, vascular surgeons, interventional radiologists, intensivists, and hospitalists.
Conclusion: Mass shooting events are associated with high mortality. Survivors commonly sustain multiple, life-threatening ballistic injuries requiring emergent surgery and extensive hospital resources. Given the increasing frequency of mass shootings, all hospitals must have a coordinated plan to respond to a mass casualty event.
Level of evidence: Epidemiological Study, level V.
References
-
- World Health Organization. Mass casualty management systems, 2007 pg 30.
-
- Callcut RA, Robles AM, Kornblith LZ, Plevin RE, Mell MW. Effect of mass shootings on gun sales—a 20-year perspective. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019;87(3):531–540.
-
- Philpott-Jones S. Mass shootings, mental illness, and gun control. Hastings Cent Rep. 2018;48(2):7–9.
-
- Cheatham ML, Smith CP, Ibrahim JA, Havron WS, Lube MW, Levy MS, Ono SK. Orlando Regional Medical Center responds to pulse nightclub shooting. Bull Am Coll Surg. 2016;101(11):12–19.
-
- Havron WS 3rd, Safcsak K, Corsa J, Loudon A, Cheatham ML. Psychological effect of a mass casualty event on general surgery residents. J Surg Educ. 2017;74(6):e74–e80.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
