Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Apr;22(4):555-559.
doi: 10.1111/jch.13837. Epub 2020 Feb 28.

The optimal use of automated office blood pressure measurement in clinical practice

Affiliations
Review

The optimal use of automated office blood pressure measurement in clinical practice

Emmanuel A Andreadis et al. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2020 Apr.

Abstract

This evidence-based article endorses the use of automated office blood pressure (AOBP). AOBP is the most favorable office blood pressure (BP) measuring technique as it provides accurate readings with 3-15 mm Hg lower values than the casual conventional office measurements with auscultatory or semi-automated oscillometric devices and relates closely to awake ABP readings. The AOBP technique seems to be superior to conventional office BP in predicting hypertension-mediated organ damage and appears to be equally reliable to awake ABP in the prediction of cardiovascular (CV) disease. AOBP readings should be obtained either unattended, with the patient alone in the examination room, or attended with the presence of personnel in the room but with no talking to the patient, although this recommendation is not frequently followed in routine clinical practice. To optimize office BP readings, the type of device, the rest period before AOBP measurements (preceding rest), and the time intervals between measurements were evaluated. As AOBP readings have the advantage of removing many confounding factors, the authors propose to perform measurements with a preceding rest in all patients at the initial visit; if AOBP readings remain <130 mm Hg in subsequent visits, measurements could be accepted, otherwise, if are higher, patients should be evaluated by out-of-office BP measurements.

Keywords: automated office blood pressure; blood pressure measurement/monitoring; hypertension; observer presence; rest.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Comment in

References

    1. Myers MG. Automated blood pressure measurement in routine clinical practice. Blood Pressure Monit. 2006;11:59‐62. - PubMed
    1. Myers MG, Valdivieso MA. Use of automated blood pressure recording device, the BpTRU, to reduce the “white coat effect” in routine practice. Am J Hypertens. 2003;16:494‐497. - PubMed
    1. Myers MG. A short history of automated office blood pressure ‐ 15 years to SPRINT. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2016;18:721‐724. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Padwal R, Campbell NRC, Schutte AE, et al. Optimizing observer performance of clinic blood pressure measurement: a position statement from the Lancet Commission on Hypertension Group. J Hypertens. 2019;37:1737‐1745. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Myers MG, Godwin M, Dawes M, et al. Conventional versus automated measurement of blood pressure in primary care patients with systolic hypertension: randomized parallel design controlled trial. BMJ. 2011;342:d286. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources