Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb 5;3(2):e200202.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.0202.

Tumor Mutational Burden From Tumor-Only Sequencing Compared With Germline Subtraction From Paired Tumor and Normal Specimens

Affiliations

Tumor Mutational Burden From Tumor-Only Sequencing Compared With Germline Subtraction From Paired Tumor and Normal Specimens

Kaushal Parikh et al. JAMA Netw Open. .

Abstract

Importance: Tumor mutation burden (TMB) is an emerging factor associated with survival with immunotherapy. When tumor-normal pairs are available, TMB is determined by calculating the difference between somatic and germline sequences. In the case of commonly used tumor-only sequencing, additional steps are needed to estimate the somatic alterations. Computational tools have been developed to determine germline contribution based on sample copy state, purity estimates, and occurrence of the variant in population databases; however, there is potential for sampling bias in population data sets.

Objective: To investigate whether tumor-only filtering approaches overestimate TMB.

Design, setting, and participants: This was a retrospective cohort study of 50 tumor samples from 10 different tumor types. A 595-gene panel test was used to assess TMB by adding all missense, indels, and frameshift variants with an allelic fraction of at least 5% and coverage of at least 100× within each tumor. Tumor-only TMB was evaluated against the criterion standard of matched germline-subtracted TMB at 3 levels. Level 1 removed all the tumor-only variants with allelic fraction of at least 1% in the Exome Aggregation Consortium database (with the Cancer Genome Atlas cohort removed). Level 2 removed all variants observed in population databases, simulating a naive approach of removing germline variation. Level 3 used an internal tumor-only pipeline for calculating TMB. These specimens were processed with a commercially available panel, and results were analyzed at the Mayo Clinic. Data were analyzed between December 1, 2018, and May 28, 2019.

Main outcomes and measures: Tumor mutation burden per megabase (Mb) as determined by 3 levels of filtering and germline subtraction.

Results: There were significantly higher estimates of TMB with level 1 (median [range] mutations per Mb, 28.8 [17.5-67.1]), level 2 (median [range] mutations per Mb, 20.8 [10.4-30.8]), and level 3 (median [range] mutations per Mb, 3.8 [0.8-12.1]) tumor-only filtering approaches than those determined by germline subtraction (median [range] mutations per Mb, 1.7 [0.4-9.2]). There were no strong associations between TMB estimates and tumor-germline TMB for level 1 filtering (r = 0.008; 95% CI, -0.004 to 0.020), level 2 filtering (r = 0.018; 95% CI, 0.003 to 0.033), or level 3 filtering (r = 0.54; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.68).

Conclusions and relevance: The findings of this study indicate that tumor-only approaches that filter variants in population databases can overestimate TMB compared with germline subtraction methods. Despite improved association with more stringent filtering approaches, these falsely elevated estimates may result in the inappropriate categorization of tumor specimens and negatively affect clinical trial results and patient outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Mansfield reported receiving research support from Bristol-Meyers Squibb, Novartis, and Verily; receiving remuneration to his institution for participation on advisory boards for AbbVie, BMS and Genentech; and serving as a nonremunerated director of the Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation. Dr Mansfield reported receiving support from National Institutes of Health grant P30CA015083. Dr Huether reported other support from Tempus Labs during the conduct of the study and outside the submitted work. Dr White reported receiving personal fees from Tempus Labs during the conduct of the study. Dr Hoskinson reported being a full-time paid employee of Tempus Labs, which operates a CLIA/CAP-accredited clinical genetics testing laboratory and combines molecular data with phenotypic, therapeutic, and outcome data for deeper analysis using its software platform. Dr Beaubier reported receiving other support from Tempus Labs during the conduct of the study and outside the submitted work. Dr Mansfield reported receiving other support from AbbVie Advisory Board, Genentech Advisory Board, Verily, and Novartis outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure.
Figure.. Cumming Plot Showing the Paired Mean Differences in Tumor Mutational Burden Between the Germline-Subtracted Control Group and Filtering Levels 1, 2, and 3
This plot demonstrates the paired mean differences in tumor mutational burden between the germline-subtracted control group and filtering levels 1, 2, and 3. All groups are plotted on the left panel, and each observation is represented by a dot. The paired mean differences are plotted on the right panel as a bootstrap sampling distribution. Each mean difference is depicted as a black dot. The 95% confidence intervals are indicated by the ends of the vertical error bars.

References

    1. Mansfield AS, Aubry MC, Moser JC, et al. . Temporal and spatial discordance of programmed cell death-ligand 1 expression and lymphocyte tumor infiltration between paired primary lesions and brain metastases in lung cancer. Ann Oncol. 2016;27(10):-. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdw289 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Goodman AM, Kato S, Bazhenova L, et al. . Tumor mutational burden as an independent predictor of response to immunotherapy in diverse cancers. Mol Cancer Ther. 2017;16(11):2598-2608. doi:10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-17-0386 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schumacher TN, Schreiber RD. Neoantigens in cancer immunotherapy. Science. 2015;348(6230):69-74. doi:10.1126/science.aaa4971 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Beaubier N, Bontrager M, Huether R, et al. . Integrated genomic profiling expands clinical options for patients with cancer. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37(11):1351-1360. doi:10.1038/s41587-019-0259-z - DOI - PubMed
    1. Beaubier N, Tell R, Lau D, et al. . Clinical validation of the tempus xT next-generation targeted oncology sequencing assay. Oncotarget. 2019;10(24):2384-2396. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.26797 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances