Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 May 18;27(3):taaa030.
doi: 10.1093/jtm/taaa030.

COVID-19 outbreak on the Diamond Princess cruise ship: estimating the epidemic potential and effectiveness of public health countermeasures

Affiliations

COVID-19 outbreak on the Diamond Princess cruise ship: estimating the epidemic potential and effectiveness of public health countermeasures

J Rocklöv et al. J Travel Med. .

Abstract

Background: Cruise ships carry a large number of people in confined spaces with relative homogeneous mixing. On 3 February, 2020, an outbreak of COVID-19 on cruise ship Diamond Princess was reported with 10 initial cases, following an index case on board around 21-25th January. By 4th February, public health measures such as removal and isolation of ill passengers and quarantine of non-ill passengers were implemented. By 20th February, 619 of 3700 passengers and crew (17%) were tested positive.

Methods: We estimated the basic reproduction number from the initial period of the outbreak using SEIR models. We calibrated the models with transient functions of countermeasures to incidence data. We additionally estimated a counterfactual scenario in absence of countermeasures, and established a model stratified by crew and guests to study the impact of differential contact rates among the groups. We also compared scenarios of an earlier versus later evacuation of the ship.

Results: The basic reproduction rate was initially 4 times higher on-board compared to the ${R}_0$ in the epicentre in Wuhan, but the countermeasures lowered it substantially. Based on the modeled initial ${R}_0$ of 14.8, we estimated that without any interventions within the time period of 21 January to 19 February, 2920 out of the 3700 (79%) would have been infected. Isolation and quarantine therefore prevented 2307 cases, and lowered the ${R}_0$ to 1.78. We showed that an early evacuation of all passengers on 3 February would have been associated with 76 infected persons in their incubation time.

Conclusions: The cruise ship conditions clearly amplified an already highly transmissible disease. The public health measures prevented more than 2000 additional cases compared to no interventions. However, evacuating all passengers and crew early on in the outbreak would have prevented many more passengers and crew from infection.

Keywords: Basic reproduction number; Coronavirus; Evacuation; Incubation time; Isolation and quarantine; SARS-CoV-2.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The estimated basic reproduction number, formula image, on the cruise ship and its change over time as a result of the transient interventions of quarantine and removal of infectious cases. The formula image given here assumes one index case in a totally naïve population, although that is not the case on the ship, we use it here to illustrate how the formula image is sensitive to the interventions, but still substantially large to fuel a continuation of the epidemic. The grey line indicates formula image
Figure 2
Figure 2
Predicted total number of infections using model 1 (no stratification) for the realistic situation with interventions (blue), counterfactual scenario without intervention (grey) and the net effect of the interventions (black).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Sensitivity analysis: predicting total number of infections using a model without interventions with formula image set to 3.7 with index case 21th January (bottom). Observed reports of cumulative cases are marked as ‘o’.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Predicted total number of infections using a model stratified into crew and guest for the realistic situation with interventions. Total population onboard (black), guests (grey), crew (blue). Observed total case numbers of total (black), crew (blue) and guest (grey) are marked as ‘o’.

Comment in

References

    1. Young BE, Wilder-Smith A. Influenza on cruise ships. J Travel Med 2018; 25. - PubMed
    1. Pavli A, Maltezou HC, Papadakis A et al. . Respiratory infections and gastrointestinal illness on a cruise ship: a three-year prospective study. Travel Med Infect Dis 2016; 14:389–97. - PubMed
    1. Borborema SE, Silva DB, Silva KC et al. . Molecular characterization of influenza B virus outbreak on a cruise ship in Brazil 2012. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo 2014; 56:185–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ward KA, Armstrong P, McAnulty JM, Iwasenko JM, Dwyer DE. Outbreaks of pandemic (H1N1) 2009 and seasonal influenza a (H3N2) on cruise ship. Emerg Infect Dis 2010; 16:1731–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brotherton JM, Delpech VC, Gilbert GL et al. . A large outbreak of influenza a and B on a cruise ship causing widespread morbidity. Epidemiol Infect 2003; 130:263–71. - PMC - PubMed