Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb 18:11:121-129.
doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S238221. eCollection 2020.

Residents Take the Lead: A Modern Collaborative Approach to Research During Residency

Alev J Atalay  1 , Kevin Ard  2 , Emily Bethea  3 , Kenneth B Christopher  4 , Maria A Yialamas  1
Affiliations

Residents Take the Lead: A Modern Collaborative Approach to Research During Residency

Alev J Atalay et al. Adv Med Educ Pract. .

Abstract

Background: Participation in scholarship is a requirement for Internal Medicine (IM) residencies, but programs struggle to successfully integrate research into busy clinical schedules. In 2013, the IM residency at Brigham and Women's Hospital implemented the Housestaff Research Project (HRP)- a novel residency-wide research initiative designed to facilitate participation in scholarship. The HRP had two components-a formal research curriculum and an infrastructure that provided funding and mentorship for resident-led, housestaff wide projects.

Methods: This is a mixed-methods study of 190 IM residents and two HRP-supported research projects. Seventy-seven residents responded to an electronic survey about their interests in research exposure in residency. Fifty-six residents responded to an electronic survey about their participation in the HRP. The success of HRP-supported projects was evaluated through resident comments, interviews with three residents leading the first two HRPs and a description of the success of the projects based on resident involvement and dissemination of the results.

Results: Eighty-seven percent (n= 67/77) of residents were interested in additional research exposure during residency. Ninety-five percent (n = 53/56) of residents had heard of the HRP, and 77% had participate in at least one aspect of it. Approximately 20 residents were directly involved in the two resident-led projects. HRP-supported projects resulted in presentations at three local and three national conferences, one manuscript in press, and one manuscript in preparation. The resident project leaders felt that a strength and unique aspect of the HRP was the collaboration with co-residents.

Conclusion: The HRP successfully created a culture of research and scholarship within the residency. The HRP leaders and residents that participated in HRP-supported projects expressed the most direct benefits from the program. All residents were exposed to research concepts and methods. Future directions for the HRP include selecting projects that maximize the number of resident participants and integrating a more robust research curriculum.

Keywords: graduate medical education; internal medicine; postgraduate training; research training.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

References

    1. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. ACGME program requirements for graduate medical education in internal medicine. Available from: http://www.acgme.org/Portals/0/PFAssets/ProgramRequirements/140_internal.... Accessed October31, 2016. - PubMed
    1. Levine RB, Hebert RS, Wright SM. Resident research and scholarly activity in internal medicine residency training programs. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:155–159. doi:10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.40270.x - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Durning SJ, Cation LJ, Ender PT, Gutierrez-Nunez JJ. A resident research director can improve internal medicine resident research productivity. Teach Learn Med. 2004;16:279–283. doi:10.1207/s15328015tlm1603_11 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ruiz J, Wallace EL, Miller DP, et al. A comprehensive 3-year internal medicine residency research curriculum. Am J Med. 2011;124:469–473. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.01.006 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kohlwes J, O’Brien B, Stanley M, et al. Does research training during residency promote scholarship and influence career choice? A cross-sectional analysis of a 10-year cohort of the UCSF-PRIME internal medicine residency program. Teach Learn Med. 2016;28:314–319. doi:10.1080/10401334.2016.1155460 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources