Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb 26;17(5):1500.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph17051500.

Assessing the Potential Impact of a Long-Acting SkinDisinfectant in the Prevention of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Transmission

Affiliations

Assessing the Potential Impact of a Long-Acting SkinDisinfectant in the Prevention of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Transmission

Christopher T Short et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

Healthcare-associated transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)remains a persistent problem. The use of chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) as a means of decolonizingpatients, either through targeted decolonization or daily bathing, is frequently used to supplementother interventions. We explore the potential of a long-acting disinfectant with a persistent effect,immediate decolonizing action in the prevention of MRSA acquisition, and clinical illness andmortality in an 18-bed intensive care unit, based on a previous model. A scenario with nointervention is compared to CHG bathing, which decolonizes patients but provides no additionalprotection, and a hypothetical treatment that both decolonizes them and provides protection fromsubsequent colonization. The duration and effectiveness of this protection is varied to fully explorethe potential utility of such a treatment. Increasing the effectiveness of the decolonizing agentreduces colonization, with a 10% increase resulting in a colonization rate ratio (RR) of 0.89 (95% CI:0.89,0.90). Increasing the duration of protection results in a much more modest reduction, with a 12-hour increase in protection resulting in an RR of 0.99 (95% CI: 0.99, 0.99). There is little evidence ofsynergy between the two.

Keywords: MRSA; decolonization; hospital epidemiology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic representation of the compartmental flow of a mathematical model of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus transmission in an intensive care unit. Arrows indicate possible transition states. Nurses and doctors are classified as uncontaminated or contaminated (NU/DU and NC/DC respectively), while patients may be uncolonized (PU), colonized (PC), temporarily protected from colonization (PP) and bacteremic (PB).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Structured layout of an intensive care unit. Patients (teal) are treated by a single assigned nurse (orange), while a single intensivist (red) randomly treats all patients in the ward. Figure by Eric Lofgren is licensed under CC-BY-4.0.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Scatterplot of incident MRSA acquisitions in an 18-bed ICU over a simulated year. Each dot represents one of 10,000 iterations of a stochastic model, simulating a spread of possible levels of effectiveness and duration of protection for a hypothetical long-acting decolonization agent.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Scatterplot of incident MRSA-related bacteremia cases in an 18-bed ICU over a simulated year. Each dot represents one of 10,000 iterations of a stochastic model, simulating a spread of possible levels of effectiveness and duration of protection for a hypothetical long-acting decolonization agent.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kourtis A.P., Hatfield K., Baggs J., Mu Y., See I., Epson E., Nadle J., Kainer M.A., Dumyati G., Petit S., et al. Vital signs: Epidemiology and recent trends in methicillin-resistant and in methicillin-susceptible staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections-United States. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2019;68:214–219. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6809e1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kim H.Y., Lee W.K., Na S., Roh Y.H., Shin C.S., Kim J. The effects of chlorhexidine gluconate bathing on health care-associated infection in intensive care units: A meta-analysis. J. Crit. Care. 2016;32:126–137. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.11.011. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dicks K.V., Lofgren E., Lewis S.S., Moehring R.W., Sexton D.J., Anderson D.J. A Multicenter Pragmatic Interrupted Time Series Analysis of Chlorhexidine Gluconate Bathing in Community Hospital Intensive Care Units. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2016;37:1–7. doi: 10.1017/ice.2016.23. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lofgren E.T., Mietchen M.S., Short C.T., Dicks K.V., Moehring R.W., Anderson D.J. Estimating the Per-Application Effectiveness of Chlorhexidine Gluconate and Mupirocin in Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Decolonization in Intensive Care Units. medRxiv. 2019 doi: 10.1101/19012732. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lofgren E.T., Halloran M.E., Rivers C.M., Drake J.M., Porco T.C., Lewis B., Yang W., Vespignani A., Shaman J., Eisenberg J.N.S., et al. Opinion: Mathematical models: A key tool for outbreak response. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2014;111:18095–18096. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1421551111. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types