Assessing the Potential Impact of a Long-Acting SkinDisinfectant in the Prevention of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Transmission
- PMID: 32110949
- PMCID: PMC7084547
- DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17051500
Assessing the Potential Impact of a Long-Acting SkinDisinfectant in the Prevention of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Transmission
Abstract
Healthcare-associated transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)remains a persistent problem. The use of chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) as a means of decolonizingpatients, either through targeted decolonization or daily bathing, is frequently used to supplementother interventions. We explore the potential of a long-acting disinfectant with a persistent effect,immediate decolonizing action in the prevention of MRSA acquisition, and clinical illness andmortality in an 18-bed intensive care unit, based on a previous model. A scenario with nointervention is compared to CHG bathing, which decolonizes patients but provides no additionalprotection, and a hypothetical treatment that both decolonizes them and provides protection fromsubsequent colonization. The duration and effectiveness of this protection is varied to fully explorethe potential utility of such a treatment. Increasing the effectiveness of the decolonizing agentreduces colonization, with a 10% increase resulting in a colonization rate ratio (RR) of 0.89 (95% CI:0.89,0.90). Increasing the duration of protection results in a much more modest reduction, with a 12-hour increase in protection resulting in an RR of 0.99 (95% CI: 0.99, 0.99). There is little evidence ofsynergy between the two.
Keywords: MRSA; decolonization; hospital epidemiology.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Kourtis A.P., Hatfield K., Baggs J., Mu Y., See I., Epson E., Nadle J., Kainer M.A., Dumyati G., Petit S., et al. Vital signs: Epidemiology and recent trends in methicillin-resistant and in methicillin-susceptible staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections-United States. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2019;68:214–219. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6809e1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Dicks K.V., Lofgren E., Lewis S.S., Moehring R.W., Sexton D.J., Anderson D.J. A Multicenter Pragmatic Interrupted Time Series Analysis of Chlorhexidine Gluconate Bathing in Community Hospital Intensive Care Units. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2016;37:1–7. doi: 10.1017/ice.2016.23. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Lofgren E.T., Mietchen M.S., Short C.T., Dicks K.V., Moehring R.W., Anderson D.J. Estimating the Per-Application Effectiveness of Chlorhexidine Gluconate and Mupirocin in Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Decolonization in Intensive Care Units. medRxiv. 2019 doi: 10.1101/19012732. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Lofgren E.T., Halloran M.E., Rivers C.M., Drake J.M., Porco T.C., Lewis B., Yang W., Vespignani A., Shaman J., Eisenberg J.N.S., et al. Opinion: Mathematical models: A key tool for outbreak response. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2014;111:18095–18096. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1421551111. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
