Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb 26;17(5):1514.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph17051514.

Child-to-Parent Violence as an Intervening Variable in the Relationship between Inter-Parental Violence Exposure and Dating Violence

Affiliations

Child-to-Parent Violence as an Intervening Variable in the Relationship between Inter-Parental Violence Exposure and Dating Violence

Izaskun Ibabe et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

The exposure of adult children to inter-parental violence is an indirect form of victimization which has not been widely investigated in relation to its consequences in adulthood. The main goal of this study was to analyze predictors of dating violence based on an integrated model of intergenerational transmission of violence with the assessment of potential indirect effects of inter-parental violence exposure on dating violence through child-to-parent violence and sexism. A total of 847 college students participated in this study, ranging from 18 to 25 years of age. Inter-parental violence exposure plays a relevant role in dating violence, with indirect effects through child-to-parent violence and sexism. These results support social learning theory in explaining the intergenerational transmission of violence and indicate that further attention should be paid to children exposed to inter-parental violence. Intervention models to prevent the perpetration of dating violence should include the prevention of inter-parental violence exposure and child-to-parent violence.

Keywords: child-to-parent violence; dating violence; family violence; inter-parental violence; sexism.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Structural model predicting dating violence based on 847 participants from a university student population. All estimated parameters are standardized. All factor loadings and regression coefficients are significant at p < 0.05. The SEM model included participants who had had heterosexual dating relationship.

References

    1. Ureña J., Romera E.M., Casas J.A., Viejo C., Ortega-Ruiz R. Psychometrics properties of Psychological Dating Violence Questionnaire: A study with young couples. Int. J. Clin. Health Psychol. 2015;15:52–60. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2014.07.002. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Archer J. Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review. Psychol. Bull. 2000;126:651–680. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.126.5.651. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bates E.A., Graham-Kevan N., Archer J. Testing predictions from the male control theory of men’s partner violence. Aggress. Behav. 2014;40:42–55. doi: 10.1002/ab.21499. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Graña J.L., Cuenca M. Prevalence of psychological and physical intimate partner aggression in Madrid (Spain). A dyadic analysis. Psicothema. 2014;26:343–348. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2013.262. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Straus M.A. Dominance and symmetry in partner violence by male and female university students in 32 nations. Child. Youth Serv. Rev. 2008;30:252–275. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2007.10.004. - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources