Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Aug;24(3):195-211.
doi: 10.1177/1088868320905763. Epub 2020 Feb 28.

Folk Theories of Artifact Creation: How Intuitions About Human Labor Influence the Value of Artifacts

Affiliations
Review

Folk Theories of Artifact Creation: How Intuitions About Human Labor Influence the Value of Artifacts

Madeline Judge et al. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2020 Aug.

Abstract

What are the consequences of lay beliefs about how things are made? In this article, we describe a Western folk theory of artifact creation, highlighting how intuitive dualism regarding mental and physical labor (i.e., folk psychology) can lead to the perceived transmission of properties from makers to material artifacts (i.e., folk physics), and affect people's interactions with material artifacts. We show how this folk theory structures the conceptual domain of material artifacts by differentiating the contemporary lay concepts of art/craft and industrial production, and how it influences people's evaluations of different types of artifacts and their makers. We propose that the folk theory and lay concepts of art/craft and industrial production are best understood within a specific sociohistorical context, and review potential sources of cross-cultural and cross-temporal variation. We conclude by making recommendations for future research and examining the implications for promoting environmental sustainability and social justice in production systems.

Keywords: culture; folk theories; material artifacts; organizing framework; sustainability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
The Western folk theory of artifact creation. Note. The author’s mental concept is materialized into a material artifact by the instrument’s physical assembling of the materials. It is believed that makers’ mental concept and physical essences are transferred to the material artifact (property transmission proposition). The dominant emphasis of the mental over the physical is illustrated by the use of solid versus dashed lines (mental primacy proposition).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abouab N., Gomez P. (2015). Human contact imagined during the production process increases food naturalness perceptions. Appetite, 91, 273–277. 10.1016/j.appet.2015.04.002 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Adams G. S., Flynn F. J., Norton M. I. (2012). The gifts we keep on giving: Documenting and destigmatizing the regifting taboo. Psychological Science, 23(10), 1145–1150. - PubMed
    1. Ainsworth T. (2016, February 8). Form vs. matter [Online]. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy; https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2016/entries/form-matter/
    1. Andrews D. (2015). The circular economy, design thinking and education for sustainability. Local Economy: The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit, 30(3), 305–315. 10.1177/0269094215578226 - DOI
    1. Andrighetto L., Baldissarri C., Volpato C. (2017). (Still) modern times: Objectification at work. European Journal of Social Psychology, 47(1), 25–35. 10.1002/ejsp.2190 - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources