Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb 28;20(1):133.
doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-2821-6.

Factors associated with macrosomia, hypoglycaemia and low Apgar score among Fijian women with gestational diabetes mellitus

Affiliations

Factors associated with macrosomia, hypoglycaemia and low Apgar score among Fijian women with gestational diabetes mellitus

Falahola Fuka et al. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. .

Abstract

Background: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in Fiji is a serious public health issue. However, there are no recent studies on GDM among pregnant women in Fiji. The aim of this study was to examine prevalence of, and sociodemographic factors associated with adverse neonatal outcomes among Fijian women with GDM.

Methods: We used cross-sectional data of 255 pregnant women with GDM who gave birth to singleton infants at Colonial War Memorial Hospital (CWMH) in Suva city. Women underwent testing for GDM during antenatal clinic visits and were diagnosed using modified International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) criteria. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to investigate factors associated with neonatal outcomes.

Results: Women with a previous baby weighing > 4 kg were 6.08 times more likely to experience neonatal macrosomia (Adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 6.08; 95%CI: 2.46, 15.01). Compared to unmarried women, the odds of macrosomia among married women reduced by 71% (AOR = 0.29; 95%CI: 0.11, 0.77). Compared with delivery before 38 weeks of gestation, the infants of women who delivered between 38 and 41 weeks of gestation were 62 and 86% less likely to experience neonatal hypoglycaemia and Apgar score < 7 at 5 mins, respectively. The offspring of women who were overweight and obese had higher odds of neonatal hypoglycaemia. Late booking in gestation (≥28 weeks) was significantly associated with Apgar score < 7 at 5 min (AOR = 7.87; 95%CI: 1.11, 55.75). Maternal pre-eclampsia/pregnancy induced hypertension was another factor associated with low Apgar score in infants.

Conclusions: The study found high rates of adverse neonatal outcomes among off springs of Fijian women with GDM and showed that interventions targeting pregnant women who are overweight, had a previous baby weighing > 4 kg, had pre-eclampsia, delivered before 38 weeks of gestation, and those who booked later than 13 weeks in gestation, are needed to improve pregnancy outcomes.

Keywords: Apgar score; Diabetes; Fiji; Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM); Hypoglycaemia; Macrosomia; Pacific people; Pregnancy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) testing among pregnant women in an urban Fiji hospital. All pregnant women are routinely tested for GDM using a two-step process consisting of the 1-h glucose challenge test (GCT) at 24–28 weeks including a non-fasting 50 g glucose load and if GCT was ≥ 7.8 mmol/l, a 2-h 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was then performed. One abnormal value is sufficient for diagnosis. The women with any known risk factor for GDM including age ≥ 30 years, strong family history of diabetes, past history of GDM, previous macrosomic baby and high maternal pre-pregnancy BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2, proceed to OGTT at initial testing. Those who are at high risk for GDM (i.e. women with two or more of the risk factors present at booking) proceed directly to a 2-h 75 g OGTT at the time of their booking with the antenatal clinic. If the early testing with OGTT was normal (fasting < 5.1 mmol/L, 2 h < 8.5 mmol/L), the high-risk women underwent another 75-g OGTT at 24–28 weeks’ gestation
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Prevalence of neonatal outcomes among Fijian women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). LGA, large for gestational age

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Nankervis A, McIntyre H, Moses R, Ross G, Callaway L, Porter C, Jeffries W, Boorman C, De Vries B, AJMJ ME. ADIPS consensus guidelines for the testing and diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus in Australia. 2014.
    1. Simmons D. Epidemiology of diabetes in pregnancy. A Practical Manual of Diabetes in Pregnancy. 2017;3:1–16.
    1. Bellamy L, Casas JP, Hingorani AD, Williams D. Type 2 diabetes mellitus after gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2009;373(9677):1773–1779. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60731-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sellers EA, Dean HJ, Shafer LA, Martens PJ, Phillips-Beck W, Heaman M, Prior HJ, Dart AB, McGavock J, Morris M, et al. Exposure to gestational diabetes mellitus: impact on the development of early-onset type 2 diabetes in Canadian first nations and non-first nations offspring. Diabetes Care. 2016;39(12):2240–2246. doi: 10.2337/dc16-1148. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dabelea D, Mayer-Davis EJ, Lamichhane AP, D'Agostino RB, Jr, Liese AD, Vehik KS, Narayan KM, Zeitler P, Hamman RF. Association of intrauterine exposure to maternal diabetes and obesity with type 2 diabetes in youth: the SEARCH case-control study. Diabetes Care. 2008;31(7):1422–1426. doi: 10.2337/dc07-2417. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms