Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Jun;17(6):372-381.
doi: 10.1038/s41571-020-0332-z. Epub 2020 Feb 28.

All change in the prostate cancer diagnostic pathway

Affiliations
Review

All change in the prostate cancer diagnostic pathway

Derek J Lomas et al. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2020 Jun.

Abstract

Following detection of high levels of serum prostate-specific antigen, many men are advised to have transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy in an attempt to locate a cancer. This nontargeted approach lacks accuracy and carries a small risk of potentially life-threatening sepsis. Worse still, it can detect clinically insignificant cancer cells, which are unlikely to be the origin of advanced-stage disease. The detection of these indolent cancer cells has led to overdiagnosis, one of the major problems of contemporary medicine, whereby many men with clinically insignificant disease are advised to undergo unnecessary radical surgery or radiotherapy. Advances in imaging and biomarker discovery have led to a revolution in prostate cancer diagnosis, and nontargeted prostate biopsies should become obsolete. In this Perspective article, we describe the current diagnostic pathway for prostate cancer, which relies on nontargeted biopsies, and the problems linked to this pathway. We then discuss the utility of prebiopsy multiparametric MRI and novel tumour markers. Finally, we comment on how the incorporation of these advances into a new diagnostic pathway will affect the current risk-stratification system and explore future challenges.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Wang, M., Valenzuela, L., Murphy, G. & Chu, T. Purification of a human prostate specific antigen. Investig. Urol. 17, 159–163 (1979).
    1. Nadji, M. et al. Prostatic-specific antigen: an immunohistologic marker for prostatic neoplasms. Cancer 48, 1229–1232 (1981). - PubMed - DOI
    1. Kuriyama, M. et al. Use of human prostate-specific antigen in monitoring prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 41, 3874–3876 (1981). - PubMed
    1. Catalona, W. J. et al. Comparison of digital rectal examination and serum prostate specific antigen in the early detection of prostate cancer: results of a multicenter clinical trial of 6,630 men. J. Urol. 151, 1283–1290 (1994). - PubMed - DOI
    1. Etzioni, R. et al. Quantifying the role of PSA screening in the US prostate cancer mortality decline. Cancer Causes Control 19, 175–181 (2008). - PubMed - DOI

Publication types

MeSH terms