Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct 13;22(4):805-818.
doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxz067.

Estimation and inference for the population attributable risk in the presence of misclassification

Affiliations

Estimation and inference for the population attributable risk in the presence of misclassification

Benedict H W Wong et al. Biostatistics. .

Abstract

Because it describes the proportion of disease cases that could be prevented if an exposure were entirely eliminated from a target population as a result of an intervention, estimation of the population attributable risk (PAR) has become an important goal of public health research. In epidemiologic studies, categorical covariates are often misclassified. We present methods for obtaining point and interval estimates of the PAR and the partial PAR (pPAR) in the presence of misclassification, filling an important existing gap in public health evaluation methods. We use a likelihood-based approach to estimate parameters in the models for the disease and for the misclassification process, under main study/internal validation study and main study/external validation study designs, and various plausible assumptions about transportability. We assessed the finite sample perf ormance of this method via a simulation study, and used it to obtain corrected point and interval estimates of the pPAR for high red meat intake and alcohol intake in relation to colorectal cancer incidence in the HPFS, where we found that the estimated pPAR for the two risk factors increased by up to 317% after correcting for bias due to misclassification.

Keywords: Attributable fraction; Attributable risk; Measurement error; Misclassification; Partial population attributable risk; Population attributable risk; Validation study.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Benichou, J. (2001). A review of adjusted estimators of attributable risk. Statistical Methods in Medical Research 10, 195–216. - PubMed
    1. Bray, F. and Soerjomataram, I. (2018). Population attributable fractions continue to unmask the power of prevention. Br J Cancer 118, 1031–1032. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bruzzi, P., Green, S. B., Byar, D. P., Brinton, L. A. and Schairer, C. (1985). Estimating the population attributable risk for multiple risk factors using case-control data. American Journal of Epidemiology 122, 904–914. - PubMed
    1. Carroll, R. J., Ruppert, D., Stefanski, L. A. and Crainiceanu, C. M. (2006). Measurement Error in Nonlinear Models: A Modern Perspective. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press.
    1. Copeland, K. T., Checkoway, H., McMichael, A. J. and Holbrook, R. H. (1977). Bias due to misclassification in the estimation of relative risk. American Journal of Epidemiology 105, 488–495. - PubMed

Publication types