Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Aug;45(4):795-802.
doi: 10.1007/s10900-020-00795-y.

VA-Community Dual Care: Veteran and Clinician Perspectives

Affiliations

VA-Community Dual Care: Veteran and Clinician Perspectives

James Schlosser et al. J Community Health. 2020 Aug.

Abstract

Many veterans receive care in both community settings and the VA. Recent legislation has increased veteran access to community providers, raising concerns about safety and coordination. This project aimed to understand the benefits and challenges of dual care from the perceptions of both the Veterans their clinicians. We conducted surveys and focus groups of veterans who use both VA and community care in VT and NH. We also conducted a web-based survey and a focus group involving primary care clinicians from both settings. The main measures included (1) reasons that veterans seek care in both settings; (2) problems faced by veterans and clinicians; (3) association of health status and ease of managing care with sites of primary care; and (4) association of veteran rurality with dual care experiences. The primary reasons veterans reported for using both VA and community care were (1) for convenience, (2) to access needed services, and (3) to get a second opinion. Veterans reported that community and VA providers were informed about the others' care more than half the time. Veterans in isolated rural towns reported better overall health and ease of managing their care. VA and community primary care clinicians reported encountering systems problems with dual-care including communicating medication changes, sharing lab and imaging results, communicating with specialists, sharing discharge summaries and managing medication renewals. Both Veterans and their primary clinicians report substantial system issues in coordinating care between the VA and the community, raising the potential for significant patient safety and Veteran satisfaction concerns.

Keywords: Care coordination; Dual care; Primary care; Rural care; Veterans.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure:
Figure:
Frequency of Clinician Reports of Systems Problems with Dual Care

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Charlton ME. et al., “Veteran Use of Health Care Systems in Rural States: Comparing VA and Non-VA Health Care Use Among Privately Insured Veterans Under Age 65,” J. Rural Heal, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 407–417, September 2016. - PubMed
    1. Cordasco KM, Mengeling MA, Yano EM, and Washington DL, “Health and Health Care Access of Rural Women Veterans: Findings From the National Survey of Women Veterans,” J. Rural Heal, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 397–406, 2016. - PubMed
    1. West AN and Charlton ME, “Insured Veterans’ Use of VA and Non-VA Health Care in a Rural State,” J. Rural Heal, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 387–396, 2016. - PubMed
    1. “Public Law 113 – 146 - Veterans Access, Choice, and Accountability Act of 2014 - Content Details - PLAW-113publ146” [Online]. Available: https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/PLAW-113publ146 [Accessed: 20-Dec-2019].
    1. Sayre GG, Neely EL, Simons CE, Sulc CA, Au DH, and Michael Ho P, “Accessing Care Through the Veterans Choice Program: The Veteran Experience,” J. Gen. Intern. Med, vol. 33, no. 10, pp. 1714–1720, October 2018. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources